Drug Combinationsa | CI Values at: | Weighted Average CI Valuesb | Assigned Symbolc | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EC50 | EC75 | EC90 | EC95 | |||
AZT + DDC | 1.469 | 1.321 | 1.189 | 1.107 | 1.211 | – – |
AZT + DDI | 0.992 | 0.956 | 0.925 | 0.907 | 0.931 | ± |
AZT + D4T | 1.772 | 1.622 | 1.485 | 1.399 | 1.567 | – – – |
AZT + IFN | 0.897 | 0.920 | 0.954 | 0.982 | 0.953 | ± |
AZT + NEV | 0.455 | 0.451 | 0.446 | 0.444 | 0.447 | + + + |
AZT + ABT-538 | 0.580 | 0.603 | 0.628 | 0.647 | 0.626 | + + + |
DDI + DDC | 1.377 | 1.421 | 1.466 | 1.498 | 1.461 | – – – |
DDI + D4T | 1.606 | 1.551 | 1.499 | 1.464 | 1.506 | – – – |
DDI + NEV | 0.770 | 0.685 | 0.611 | 0.566 | 0.624 | + + + |
DDI + IFN | 0.619 | 0.711 | 0.819 | 0.905 | 0.812 | + + |
DDI + ABT-538 | 0.619 | 0.602 | 0.594 | 0.593 | 0.598 | + + + |
DDC + D4T | 1.152 | 1.049 | 0.956 | 0.899 | 0.971 | ± |
DDC + NEV | 1.064 | 0.946 | 0.842 | 0.778 | 0.859 | + |
DDC + ABT-538 | 0.952 | 0.890 | 0.833 | 0.798 | 0.842 | + + |
DDC + IFN | 0.890 | 0.842 | 0.808 | 0.791 | 0.816 | + + |
D4T + NEV | 1.189 | 1.075 | 0.973 | 0.909 | 0.989 | ± |
D4T + IFN | 0.940 | 0.850 | 0.774 | 0.730 | 0.782 | + + |
D4T + ABT-538 | 1.263 | 1.225 | 1.188 | 1.163 | 1.193 | – |
IFN + NEV | 0.575 | 0.563 | 0.555 | 0.553 | 0.558 | + + + |
IFN + ABT-538 | 0.921 | 0.778 | 0.673 | 0.617 | 0.696 | + + + |
NEV + ABT-538 | 0.876 | 0.807 | 0.744 | 0.705 | 0.754 | + + |
↵ a The combination ratios are designed to approximate the IC50 ratios in which the seven drugs and their corresponding constituent components have the combination ratio of AZT/DDI/DDC/IFN/D4T/NEV/ABT-538 = 1:1600:50:16:10:40:4
↵ b Because the high degrees of effects are more important to the chemotherapy than the low degrees of effects, the weighted CI value was designed as CIwt = [CI50 + 2CI75 + 3CI90 + 4CI95]/10
↵ c Degrees of synergism (+ signs) or antagonism (– signs) are based on the ranges of CI values as described in Table 4