Author | Sample Size | Site of TMS | Frequency | Sessions | Behavioral Effect? | Active Sham Control |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
De Ridder et al. (2011) | 1 | ACC | 1–35 Hz | 3 mo | Yes | No |
Herremans et al. (2012) | 15 | R DLPFC | 20 Hz | 1 | No | Between groups |
Herremans et al. (2013) | 29 | R DLPFC | 20 Hz | 2 | No | Within subject |
Hoppner et al. (2011) | 10 | L DLPFC | 20 Hz | 10 | No | Between groups |
Mishra et al. (2010) | 30 | R DLPFC | 10 Hz | 1 | Yes | Between groups |
Ceccanti et al. (2015) | 18 | dMPFCa | 20 Hz | 10 | Yes | Between groups |
Herremans et al. (2015) | 26 | R DLPFC | 20 Hz | 15 (over 4 days) | No | No |
Herremans et al. (2016) | 19 | R DLPFC | 14 (over 3 days) | Rate-dependent change (ACC) | ||
Hanlon et al. (2017) | 25 | L MPFC | cTBS | 1 (3600 pulses)z | No | Yes, between |
↵a Studies used H-coil TMS devices (Brainsway, Jerusalem, Israel). This deep TMS coil geometry has a very different field distribution than the typical figure of eight coils.