Abbreviations
- α:
-
Slope of linear disease status curve
- Ce:
-
Effect compartment concentration
- CeSS :
-
Steady state effect site concentration at the start of each levodopa infusion derived from endogenous dopamine and previous exogenous levodopa administration
- C0pnss:
-
Non-steady state levodopa concentration in plasma
- C0snss:
-
Non-steady state component of the slow equilibration effect compartment
- D max :
-
Maximum levodopa induced response above baseline
- Dvtpk:
-
Duration of uniform diurnal input.
- EC50:
-
Concentration at which 50% of maximum response is produced.
- E max :
-
Maximum tapping rates that a drug can produce.
- Hill:
-
Hill coefficient which determine the steepness of the concentration–response curve.
- RDiurnal :
-
Ratio of diurnal input to constant input of endogenous dopamine
- Rsynd:
-
Rate of levodopa equivalent dopamine synthesis in the dopa synthesis effect compartment during the diurnal input period
- S0:
-
Baseline status
- Teqd:
-
Equilibration half-life of the dopa synthesis effect compartment
- Teqf:
-
Equilibration half-life of the fast equilibration effect compartment
- Teqs:
-
Equilibration half-life of the slow equilibration effect compartment
References
Nutt JG, Holford NHG (1996) The response to levodopa in Parkinson’s disease: Imposing pharmacological law and order. Ann Neurol 39:561–573
Chan PL, Nutt JG, Holford NH (2005) Importance of within subject variation in levodopa pharmacokinetics: a 4 year cohort study in Parkinson’s disease. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 32(3–4):307–331, Aug
Chan PL, Nutt JG, Holford NH (2005) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes during the first four years of levodopa treatment in Parkinson’s disease. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 32(3–4):459–484, Aug
Chan PL, Nutt JG, Holford NH (2007) Levodopa slows progression of Parkinson’s disease. External validation by clinical trial simulation. Pharm Res 24(4):791–802, Apr
Chan PLS, Nutt JG, Holford NHG (2004) Modeling the short and long duration responses to exogenous levodopa and to endogenous levodopa production in Parkinson’s disease. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 31(3):243–268
Holford NHG, Chan PL, Nutt JG, Kieburtz K, Shoulson I (2006) Disease progression and pharmacodynamics in Parkinson disease - evidence for functional protection with levodopa and other treatments. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn 33(3):281–311, Jun
Holford NHG, Sheiner LB (1981) Understanding the dose–effect relationship: clinical application of pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic models. Clin Pharmacokinet 6(6):429–453
Hardy J, Selkoe DJ (2002) The amyloid hypothesis of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and problems on the road to therapeutics. Science 297(5580):353–356, Jul 19
Bernheimer H, Birkmayer W, Hornykiewicz O, Jellinger K, Seitelberger F (1973) Brain dopamine and the syndromes of Parkinson and Huntington. Clinical, morphological and neurochemical correlations. J Neurol Sci 20(4):415–455, Dec
Cotzias GC, Van Woert MH, Schiffer LM (1967) Aromatic amino acids and modification of parkinsonism. N Engl J Med 276(7):374–379
Cotzias GE, Papavasiliou PS, Gellene R (1969) Modification of parkinsonism–chronic treatment with L-dopa. N Engl J Med 280(7):337–345
Fahn S, Calne DB (1978) Considerations in the management of parkinsonism. Neurology 28(1):5–7, Jan
Fahn S, Cohen G (1992) The oxidant stress hypothesis in Parkinson’s disease: evidence supporting it. Ann Neurol 32(6):804–812, Dec
Spina MB, Cohen G (1989) Dopamine turnover and glutathione oxidation: implications for Parkinson disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86(4):1398–1400, Feb
The Parkinson Study Group (1989) Effect of deprenyl on the progression of disability in early Parkinson’s disease. N Engl J Med 321:1364–1371
The Parkinson Study Group (1989) DATATOP: A multicenter controlled clinical trial in early Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol 46:1052–1060
Schulzer M, Mak E, Calne DB (1992) The antiparkinson efficacy of deprenyl derives from transient improvement that is likely to be symptomatic. Ann Neurol 32(6):795–798
Fahn S (1999) Parkinson disease, the effect of levodopa, and the ELLDOPA trial. Earlier vs Later L-DOPA. Arch Neurol 56(5):529–535
Jonsson EN, Sheiner LB (2002) More efficient clinical trials through use of scientific model-based statistical tests. Clin Pharmacol Ther 72(6):603–614, Dec
Hauser RA, Holford NHG (2002) Quantitative description of loss of clinical benefit following withdrawal of levodopa-carbidopa and bromocriptine in early Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 17(5):961–968
Nelson MV, Berchou RC, Lewitt PA, Kareti D, Kesaree N, Schlick P et al (1989) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic modeling of L-dopa plasma concentrations and clinical effects in Parkinson’s disease after Sinemet. Clin Neuropharmacol 12(2):91–97
Nutt JG, Woodward WR, Carter JH, Gancher ST (1992) Effect of long-term therapy on the pharmacodynamics of levodopa. Relation to On–Off phenomenon. Arch Neurol 49:1123–1130
Contin M, Riva R, Matinelli P, Baruzzi A (1992) Kinetic-dynamic relationship of oral levodopa: Possible biphasic response after sequential doses in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord 7(3):244–248
Contin M, Riva R, Martinelli P, Baruzzi A (1993) Pharmacodynamic modeling of oral levodopa: Clinical application in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 43:367–371
Triggs EJ, Charles BG, Contin M, Martinelli P, Cortelli P, Riva R et al (1996) Population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of oral levodopa in parkinsonian patients. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 51:59–67
Acknowledgements
Dr. Nutt is supported by NIH RO1-NS21062 and Veterans Administration Parkinson’s Disease Research, Education and Clinical Center (PADRECC).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Holford, N., Nutt, J.G. Disease progression, drug action and Parkinson’s disease: Why time cannot be ignored. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 64, 207–216 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0427-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00228-007-0427-9