Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 49, Issue 4, 14 February 1995, Pages 461-469
Biochemical Pharmacology

Research paper
Binding thermodynamics of adenosine A2a receptor ligands

https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-2952(94)00464-WGet rights and content

Abstract

The thermodynamic parameters ΔG °, ΔH °, and ΔS ° of the binding equilibrium of seven adenosine agonists and five xanthine antagonists binding specifically to adenosine A2a receptors were determined by means of affinity measurements at six different temperatures (0, 10, 20, 25, 30 and 35 °) and van't Hoff plots. Affinity constants were measured on rat striatum membranes by saturation experiments for the selective A2a agonist 2-[p-(carboxy-ethyl)-phenethylamino]-5′-(ndashethyl) carboxamidoadenosine ([3H]CGS 21680) and by inhibition assays of [3H]CGS 21680 binding for all other compounds. Scatchard plots were monophasic in the full range of temperatures, indicating a single class of high affinity binding sites whose receptor density, BMAX, is essentially temperature independent. Van't Hoff plots were linear in the temperature range 0–30 ° for agonists and 0–35 ° for antagonists; their thermodynamic parameters fall, respectively, in the ranges 7 ⩽ ΔH ° ⩽ 50 kJ/mol and 177 ⩽ ΔS ° ⩽ 278 J K−1 mol−1 and −36 ⩽ ΔH ° ⩽ −7 kJ/mol and −33 ⩽ ΔS ° ⩽ 94 J K−1mol−1, showing that agonist binding is entropy-driven while antagonist binding is enthalpy-driven. The results are compared with those already reported for the binding of the same compounds to rat brain minus striatum adenosine A1 receptors obtained by displacing [3H]CHA as A1 selective radioligand (Borea PA et al., Mol Neuropharmacol2: 273–281, 1992). The comparison suggests that the two receptors are very similar as far as their binding sites are concerned and possibly philogenetically related. The analysis of thermodynamical data makes it possible to propose an analogical model of drug-receptor interaction which may account for both affinity and intrinsic activity properties.

References (37)

  • GA Weiland et al.

    Fundamental differences between the molecular interactions of agonists and antagonists with the β-adrenergic receptors

    Nature

    (1979)
  • ML Contreras et al.

    Thermodynamic properties of agonist interactions with the β-adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase system. I. High- and low-affinity states of agonist binding to membrane bound β-adrenergic receptors

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1986)
  • ML Contreras et al.

    Thermodynamic properties of agonist interactions with the β-adrenergic receptor-coupled adenylate cyclase system. II. Agonist binding to soluble β-adrenergic receptors

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (1986)
  • F Bree et al.

    The binding of agonists and antagonists to rat lung β-adrenergic receptors as investigated by thermodynamics and structure-activity relationships

    J Recept Res

    (1986)
  • A Miklave et al.

    On the fundamental difference in thermodynamics of agonists and antagonists interactions with β-adrenergic receptors and the mechanism of entropy-driven binding

    Biochem Pharmacol

    (1990)
  • RL Kochman et al.

    Thermodynamic changes associated with benzodiazepine and alkyl β-carboline-3-carboxylate binding to rat brain homogenates

    Mol Pharmacol

    (1982)
  • A Doble

    Comparative thermodynamics of benzodiazepine receptor ligand interactions in rat neuronal membranes

    J Neurochem

    (1983)
  • GJ Kilpatrick et al.

    The thermodynamics of agonist and antagonist binding to dopamine D-2 receptors

    Mol Pharmacol

    (1986)
  • Cited by (59)

    • Conformational Restriction and Steric Hindrance in Medicinal Chemistry

      2015, The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry: Fourth Edition
    • Pyrrolo- and pyrazolo-[3,4-e][1,2,4]triazolo[1,5-c]pyrimidines as adenosine receptor antagonists

      2012, Bioorganic and Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      Displacement binding experiments of [3H]-ZM 241385 (2 nM) to hA2ACHO membranes (50 μg of protein/assay) and at least 6–8 different concentrations of the tested ligands were performed for 60 min at 4 °C. Non-specific binding was determined in the presence of 1 μM ZM 241385 and was about 20% of total binding.36 Displacement binding experiments of [3H]-MRE-3008-F20 (1 nM) to hA3CHO membranes (50 μg of protein/assay) and at least 6–8 different concentrations of examined ligands were performed for 120 min at 4 °C.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text