Elsevier

Neuroscience

Volume 27, Issue 3, December 1988, Pages 777-783
Neuroscience

Angiotensin ii-(3–8)-hexapeptide affects motor activity, performance of passive avoidance and a conditioned avoidance response in rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/0306-4522(88)90182-0Get rights and content

Abstract

Angiotensin II-(3–8)-hexapeptide, at the dose of 1 nmol given intracerebroventricularly, only slightly less than angiotensin II (the same dose and route) stimulated exploratory locomotor behaviour in an open field and electromagnetic motimeter. Both peptides considerably enhanced stereotyped behaviour produced by apomorphine and amphetamine. Angiotensin II-(3–8)-hexapeptide improved recall in a passive avoidance situation as well as angiotensin II. The 3–8 C-terminus of angiotensin II enhanced acquisition of active avoidance nearly as effectively as the complete peptide.

The results indicate that the effectiveness of equimolar doses of angiotensin II-(3–8)-hexapeptide and angiotensin II in improving processes related to learning and memory in rats is almost identical and thus must be independent of specific angiotensin receptors in brain to which the hexapeptide binds with about 1000 times lower affinity than angiotensin II.

The stimulation of stereotypy, a dopamine-controlled behaviour, by the peptides points to the possibility of dopaminergic mediation of their psychotropic effects.

References (27)

  • BraszkoJ.J. et al.

    Effect of angiotensin II on some behavioral and neurochemical measures of the central serotonin system

    Biomed. biochim. Acta

    (1985)
  • BraszkoJ.J. et al.

    Angiotensin II [AII (3–8)] fragment improves learning and memory in rats

    Neuroscience

    (1987)
  • BrosnihanK.B. et al.

    Approaches to establishing angiotensin II as a neurotransmitter

  • Cited by (218)

    • The role of angiotensin peptides in the brain during health and disease

      2023, Angiotensin: From the Kidney to Coronavirus
    • Cognitive benefits of angiotensin IV and angiotensin-(1–7): A systematic review of experimental studies

      2018, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Similarly, Kerr et al. (2005) found that rats which had received i.h. injections of Ang IV were no different from vehicle controls, while Ang II produced a dose-dependent amnesic effect on the passive avoidance task. In contrast to these findings, two studies from the same group (Braszko et al., 1988; Braszko et al., 2006) found that i.c.v. administration of either Ang IV or Ang II in rats significantly improved recall relative to controls, increasing re-entry latencies on the passive avoidance task. The increase was approximately seven-fold in the first study.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text