The 5-year course of alcohol abuse among young adults
Introduction
Current diagnostic criteria for alcohol use disorders, published by the American Psychiatric Association (1994) in its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders—Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), distinguish between alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence. The definition of alcohol dependence draws heavily upon the alcohol dependence syndrome (Edwards & Gross, 1976) and the validity of the concept has now been well established (Helzer, 1994). The conceptual basis of alcohol abuse, other than the need for a diagnosis when alcohol use leads to impairment, has not received comparable attention (Langenbucher & Martin, 1996). Alcohol abuse is diagnosed only in the absence of dependence and is characterized by meeting one of four criteria: (1) recurrent use of alcohol in hazardous situations; (2) recurrent alcohol-related legal problems; (3) continued use despite social or interpersonal problems; or (4) failure to fulfill major role obligations.
A study of symptom onset in 369 clinical cases revealed the presence of three discrete stages, with alcohol abuse as a discrete first illness phase (Langenbucher & Chung, 1995). Hasin, Grant, and Endicott (1990) argued that if abuse constitutes a mild condition prodromal to dependence then the validity of the distinction between abuse and dependence is challenged, since it would represent an early manifestation of dependence.
There have been few longitudinal studies in the general population on the course of alcohol abuse and its relationship to alcohol dependence. Drawing upon a 1973 follow-up of a 1969 national survey of men, Hasin et al. (1990) found that 24% of the respondents reported indicators of alcohol abuse 4 years later, 46% were in remission, and 30% reported indicators of alcohol dependence. While the findings showed that the longitudinal course of alcohol abuse was significantly different from dependence, the study was restricted to men and used an earlier definition of alcohol abuse based on the then-current Third Edition Revision of the DSM, (DSM-III-R: American Psychiatric Association, 1994) that yielded a low prevalence of abuse. A subsequent study with a community sample of heavy-drinking men and women used DSM-IV diagnostic criteria with a 1-year follow-up and revealed that the course of alcohol abuse differed from that of dependence (Hasin, Van Rossem, McCloud, & Endicott, 1997). While the majority of respondents with dependence at baseline remained dependent at follow-up (67%), only 6% of respondents with abuse at baseline became dependent at follow-up, a rate comparable to that of respondents who had no alcohol diagnosis at baseline (7%).
In a related analysis of data from this community study, Hasin and Paykin (1999) used a subset of respondents who never met the criteria for DSM-IV alcohol dependence at baseline to examine the validity of the DSM-IV alcohol abuse category. Comparisons between abusers and respondents with no diagnosis indicated that abusers were younger and White, and reported higher frequencies of heavy, episodic drinking in the past year. Unlike dependence, alcohol abuse was not related to family history of alcoholism or alcohol problems. Respondents with a baseline diagnosis of alcohol abuse were six times more likely to receive a diagnosis of abuse at follow-up when compared to those with no diagnosis at baseline. Despite the fact that DSM-IV diagnosis of abuse involves four criteria, only one criterion must be met, and the majority of respondents in this study met the diagnosis based on the hazardous use criterion, which was nearly always driving after drinking too much. Given the short length of follow-up in this study, the authors suggested that further study with longer term information about the course of abuse in the general population is warranted.
The objective of the present study is to describe the course of alcohol abuse among a nationally representative sample of young adults aged 25 through 32 years in 1989 at baseline and aged 30 through 37 years 5 years later at reinterview. In addition to the demographic characteristics of age, gender, and race, the present study also compares abusers and those with no diagnosis at baseline with respect to several other characteristics associated with alcohol use disorders: family history of alcoholism, heavy episodic drinking, age at onset of alcohol use, educational status, and marital disruption. The longitudinal framework for the measures of family history and age at onset overcomes some of the limitations imposed by the cross-sectional designs of earlier studies. A second advantage in the present study is the use of a large nationally representative sample of young adults at an age when the prevalence of alcohol abuse is high. The large sample provides a unique opportunity to examine the contribution of the high-prevalence abuse item related to drinking and driving to the course of alcohol abuse.
Section snippets
Sample
Data for this study were drawn from the National Longitudinal Survey of Labor Market Experience in Youth (NLSY: Ohio State University, 1994). The NLSY is an annual survey of 12,686 young people throughout the United States. The survey was initiated in 1979 and included a representative sample of men and women aged 14 through 21 on January 1, 1979. The procedures and methods used were designed to create a database that represented the entire population born in 1957 through 1964. There were three
Statistical analysis
Two separate linear regression analyses were conducted. The first logistic regression was cross-sectional and compared characteristics of respondents having an alcohol abuse diagnosis at baseline with those having no diagnosis at baseline. The second regression was longitudinal and focused on alcohol abuse diagnoses at follow-up among respondents having abuse diagnoses at baseline compared to those having no diagnosis. In both of these analyses, baseline alcohol-dependent respondents were
Results
One-year prevalence estimates of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence for the baseline (1989) and follow-up (1994) years are summarized by gender in Table 1. Approximately 80% of the respondents at baseline and follow-up were not classified with an alcohol use disorder. In 1989 and 1994, the prevalences of abuse (15.8% and 12.1%) exceeded those of dependence (6.1% and 5.1%).
Table 2 shows the baseline and follow-up status by DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence. Among the respondents with no
Discussion
Findings from this national sample of men and women indicate that the 5-year course of alcohol abuse differed significantly from that of alcohol dependence, a finding reported in a national prospective study of men (Hasin et al., 1990) and a community study of men and women Hasin & Paykin, 1999, Hasin et al., 1997, providing further evidence for the validity of the alcohol abuse diagnostic category in general populations. The finding that relatively few abusers at Time 1 became dependent at
References (14)
Theoretical and observed subtypes of DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence in a general population sample
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(2000)- et al.
Age at onset of alcohol use and its association with DSM-IV alcohol abuse and dependence: results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey
Journal of Substance Abuse
(1997) - et al.
The alcohol use disorder and associated disabilities interview schedule. Reliability of alcohol and drug modules in a general population sample
Drug and Alcohol Dependence
(1995) - et al.
Prevalence and population validity of DSM-III-R alcohol abuse and dependence: the 1989 National Longitudinal Survey on Youth
Journal of Substance Abuse
(1994) - et al.
Differentiating DSM-IV alcohol dependence and abuse by course among community heavy drinkers
Journal of Substance Abuse
(1997) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders—4th edition (DSM-IV)
(1994)- et al.
Alcohol dependence: provisional description of a clinical syndrome
British Medical Journal
(1976)
Cited by (35)
Characteristics of developmentally early alcohol use disorder symptom reports: A prospective-longitudinal community study
2013, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Especially long-term stability was very low. This supports the well-documented moderate AUD stability (Grant et al., 2001; Wells et al., 2006) especially during transition from teenage years to early adulthood or may indicate changes in individual symptomatology with age (Jackson et al., 2006). Of interest, even symptoms that may represent greater severity had low stability (withdrawal, problem, activities) and the highest rates of long-term stability were found for symptoms with both low (tolerance) and high severity (craving).
A population-based study of inpatients admitted due to suffocation in Taiwan during 2005-2007
2013, Accident Analysis and PreventionCitation Excerpt :This phenomenon could be a possible result of the relatively higher intake of alcohol by men. Many studies had noted that the use of alcohol was much more common in men than in women (Grant et al., 2001; Danielson et al., 2009), and past research has supported the correlation between adult suffocation injuries and the consumption of alcohol (Berzlanovich et al., 1999; Boghossian et al., 2010). Moreover, other studies also suggested that the more energetic and adventurous nature of boys might be responsible for their higher risk in many types of unintentional injuries compared with girls (Li and Huang, 1999).
Impact of age at first drink on vulnerability to alcohol-related problems: Testing the marker hypothesis in a prospective study of young adults
2009, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchCitation Excerpt :During the past two decades, a burgeoning literature has emerged establishing an association between age of drinking onset and risk for later hazardous alcohol consumption and dependence. Both cross-sectional (Grant and Dawson, 1997; Hingson et al., 2006; McGue et al., 2001b) and longitudinal studies (Grant et al., 2001a; Pitkanen et al., 2008; Warner et al., 2007; Grant et al., 2001b) have indicated that the age at drinking onset is one of the strongest predictors for the development of later alcohol-related problems. Although well described, the mechanisms underlying this relationship remain unclear.
The prognostic implications of DSM-IV abuse criteria in drinking adolescents
2008, Drug and Alcohol DependenceLong-term outcomes of adolescents treated for substance misuse
2008, Drug and Alcohol DependenceThe latent structure of marijuana and cocaine use disorders: Results from the National Longitudinal Alcohol Epidemiologic Survey (NLAES)
2007, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :This syndrome was considered one “axis” of substance problems, with the consequences of heavy use (social, legal, medical problems, hazardous use) considered a different axis of substance use problems. Contrary to clinical assumptions, alcohol abuse does not necessarily lead to dependence (Hasin et al., 1990; Grant et al., 2001b; Schuckit et al., 2001, 2002). Furthermore, not all individuals with alcohol dependence or drug dependence (Grant et al., 2001a; Hasin and Grant, 2004) manifest abuse symptoms.