Review
Chemical genetic approaches for the elucidation of signaling pathways

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1367-5931(00)00215-5Get rights and content

Abstract

New chemical methods that use small molecules to perturb cellular function in ways analogous to genetics have recently been developed. These approaches include both synthetic methods for discovering small molecules capable of acting like genetic mutations, and techniques that combine the advantages of genetics and chemistry to optimize the potency and specificity of small-molecule inhibitors. Both approaches have been used to study protein function in vivo and have provided insights into complex signaling cascades.

Introduction

Renewed appreciation for the power of small organic molecules to address questions in cell biology has fueled an explosion of interest in chemical biology. The idea that small (MW<700 Da) drug-like molecules can perturb the function of specific proteins is a central tenet of pharmacology. This is further bolstered by the fact that many cellular functions are carried out by small molecules (e.g. ATP, neurotransmitters, steroid hormones, prostaglandins and phosphoinositides). Using small molecules to perturb protein function is particularly useful because the effects of drugs are:

  • 1.

    Rapid, potentially diffusion-limited.

  • 2.

    Often reversible because of metabolism/clearing.

  • 3.

    Tunable, enabling graded phenotypes by varying concentration.

  • 4.

    Conditional, because they can be introduced at any point in development.

Despite these advantages, the use of small molecules to probe cellular signaling has lagged behind that of genetic or biochemical methods. Two types of genetic experiments have provided a wealth of information about cellular processes. When identification of new components of a pathway are desired, forward genetics is used. This involves generating large numbers of mutants, screening to identify those with either gain- or loss-of-function phenotypes in a process of interest, and then identifying the mutations in the specific genes that underlie the phenotype. In order to study the function of one component, reverse genetics is used. Mutations are targeted to a particular protein and the role of the protein is inferred from the phenotype of the resulting mutant.

The advantages of genetics are that it is both highly specific (a single nucleotide change in 3 billion base pairs [bps]) and highly portable (any organism can, in principle, be genetically modified). In contrast, it is often difficult to identify a small molecule that binds specifically to a single enzyme active site out of up to 30,000 proteins, some of which have highly homologous active sites. Additionally, unlike genetic systems, the synthesis of each small molecule presents unique challenges and is not sufficiently general to systematically inactivate every gene product in an organism.

Nonetheless, despite the important advantages of high specificity and portability there can be problems with traditional genetics. For example, when gene knock-outs are lethal, further study of the mutant organism is complicated. Also, most genetic mutations are not conditional; they cannot be turned on or off at will. Although conditional mutations can be introduced through the use of an inducible promoter, generation of the mutated protein occurs over hours to days. Conditional mutations can also be found that are rapidly manifested by an external stress, such as heat (TS alleles), but this stress can often have unwanted side-effects such as induction of heat stress proteins. Thirdly, knock-out phenotypes of non-essential genes can often be masked by functional compensation by related genes during development by the organism. Chemical genetic strategies using small molecules that act as mutations would complement traditional genetic studies by providing a general means to rapidly and conditionally inactivate proteins.

The key question becomes, how can we identify specific chemical inhibitors of every gene product in the yeast, worm, fly, mouse and human proteomes? The ideal drug is one that shows perfect target-specific behavior and can be given to an animal to inactivate its target almost instantaneously. In this review, we highlight two complementary approaches to generate and identify such molecules, and describe ways in which these molecules have been used to study biological processes.

Section snippets

Chemistry as a genetics-like tool

To use small molecules as biological probes, both high affinity and specificity are necessary. One approach is to find small molecules that are capable of activating or inactivating gene function by direct interaction with the gene product 1., 2.. Historically, natural products have been used to accomplish this task. To expand the scope of inhibitable proteins, efforts have focused on generating libraries of molecules to be screened.

Several recent examples highlight some of the approaches that

Chemistry coupled to genetics

A fundamentally different way of using chemistry to study biology is to combine chemistry with genetics in one experimental regime [36]. When trying to perturb biological function using small molecules, the central problem is to find small molecules that interact specifically with a desired protein target. Generating specific drugs is especially challenging when the protein target shares a high degree of homology with other proteins in the cell. When using drugs as biological probes, however,

Conclusions and future directions

The intersection between genomics, proteomics, combinatorial organic synthesis, natural-product screening, and protein design has created an exciting environment for the development of powerful new tools that have been termed chemical genetics. To date, our view of biological phenomena has been shaped largely through the use of genetics. Yet, we know that genetics has limitations. The use of chemical agents to probe pathways provides information that, when superimposed with genetic and

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to V Denic, HF Luecke, JW Taunton and members of the Shokat laboratory for helpful discussions and critical comments on this manuscript. PJA thanks the Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (PDF 2000 78) and the American Cancer Society (PF-01-095-01-TBE), and MSK thanks the National Institutes of Health (AI10611-01) for postdoctoral fellowships. KMS thanks the National Institutes of Health (CA70331-05 and AI44009-03), GlaxoSmithKline and the Sandler Family Supporting Foundation

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review,have been highlighted as:

  • •of special interest

  • ••of outstanding interest

References (53)

  • Y.W. Hwang et al.

    A mutation that alters the nucleotide specificity of elongation factor Tu, a GTP regulatory protein

    J Biol Chem

    (1987)
  • A.C. Bishop et al.

    Design of allele-specific inhibitors to probe protein kinase signaling

    Curr Biol

    (1998)
  • A.C. Bishop et al.

    Acquisition of inhibitor-sensitive protein kinases through protein design

    Pharmacol Ther

    (1999)
  • T. Hunter

    Signaling – 2000 and beyond

    Cell

    (2000)
  • J.H. Hanke et al.

    Discovery of a novel, potent, and Src family-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor: study of Lck- and FynT-dependent T cell activation

    J Biol Chem

    (1996)
  • B.R. Stockwell

    Chemical genetics: ligand-based discovery of gene function

    Nat Rev Genet

    (2000)
  • B.A. Bunin et al.

    A general and expedient method for the solid-phase synthesis of 1,4-benzodiazepine derivatives

    J Am Chem Soc

    (1992)
  • S.H. Dewitt et al.

    “Diversomers” – an approach to nonpeptide, nonoligomeric chemical diversity

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (1993)
  • J.A. Ellman

    Design, synthesis, and evaluation of small-molecule libraries

    Acc Chem Res

    (1996)
  • L.A. Thompson et al.

    Synthesis and applications of small molecule libraries

    Chem Rev

    (1996)
  • P. Arya et al.

    Diversity-based organic synthesis in the era of genomics and proteomics

    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl

    (2001)
  • B.E. Evans et al.

    Methods for drug discovery: development of potent, selective, orally effective cholecystokinin antagonists

    J Med Chem

    (1988)
  • N.S. Gray et al.

    Exploiting chemical libraries, structure, and genomics in the search for kinase inhibitors

    Science

    (1998)
  • J.I. Armstrong et al.

    Discovery of carbohydrate sulfotransferase inhibitors from a kinase-directed library

    Angew Chem Int Ed Engl

    (2000)
  • K.C. Nicolaou et al.

    Natural product-like combinatorial libraries based on privileged structures. 1. General principles and solid-phase synthesis of benzopyrans

    J Am Chem Soc

    (2000)
  • K.C. Nicolaou et al.

    Natural product-like combinatorial libraries based on privileged structures. 2. Construction of a 10,000-membered benzopyran library by directed split-and-pool chemistry using NanoKans and optical encoding

    J Am Chem Soc

    (2000)
  • Cited by (119)

    • A Bump-Hole Approach for Directed RNA Editing

      2019, Cell Chemical Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The duplex sequence used here is derived from that found near a known editing site in the human glioma factor 1 mRNA and was used in our earlier structural studies (Matthews et al., 2016). The abasic site, lacking a nucleobase, provides the “hole” to accommodate the “bump” of the E488F and E488Y mutant proteins (Alaimo et al., 2001; Belshaw et al., 1995). We evaluated the effects of these structural changes by measuring deamination rate constants under single-turnover conditions (Zheng et al., 2017; Phelps et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text