Elsevier

The Lancet Neurology

Volume 8, Issue 4, April 2009, Pages 398-412
The Lancet Neurology

Review
Preconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(09)70054-7Get rights and content

Summary

Neuroprotection and brain repair in patients after acute brain damage are still major unfulfilled medical needs. Pharmacological treatments are either ineffective or confounded by adverse effects. Consequently, endogenous mechanisms by which the brain protects itself against noxious stimuli and recovers from damage are being studied. Research on preconditioning, also known as induced tolerance, over the past decade has resulted in various promising strategies for the treatment of patients with acute brain injury. Several of these strategies are being tested in randomised clinical trials. Additionally, research into preconditioning has led to the idea of prophylactically inducing protection in patients such as those undergoing brain surgery and those with transient ischaemic attack or subarachnoid haemorrhage who are at high risk of brain injury in the near future. In this Review, we focus on the clinical issues relating to preconditioning and tolerance in the brain; specifically, we discuss the clinical situations that might benefit from such procedures. We also discuss whether preconditioning and tolerance occur naturally in the brain and assess the most promising candidate strategies that are being investigated.

Introduction

Organisms have evolved mechanisms to protect against tissue damage and to compensate (or even regenerate) in the event of injury. The two most elementary challenges, and thus the greatest evolutionary pressures, for living organisms are infection and deprivation of substrate or energy. Pathophysiological research has focused on mechanisms by which tissue is damaged by noxious stimuli or processes and how to prevent this injury.

To identify endogenous mechanisms of protection and repair, and to make use of these mechanisms therapeutically, biomedical investigators have developed preconditioning strategies. Preconditioning is a procedure by which a noxious stimulus near to but below the threshold of damage is applied to the tissue. Shortly after preconditioning or after a delay, the organ (and therefore the organism) develops resistance to, or tolerance of, the same, similar, or even different noxious stimuli given beyond the threshold of damage. Preconditioning thereby protects against subsequent injury.

Ischaemic brain injuries, resulting either from global or focal decreases in perfusion, are among the most common and important causes of disability and death worldwide. The consequences of global cerebral ischaemia after cardiac arrest (and successful resuscitation), focal occlusions or disruption of brain vessels (ie, stroke, including subarachnoid haemorrhage and intraparenchymatous haemorrhage), and ischaemic brain damage after cardiac or brain surgery affect many millions of people in the USA alone.1, 2 Research into preconditioning aims at developing new therapeutic approaches to benefit these patients. On the one hand, preconditioning is an attractive experimental strategy to identify endogenous protective or regenerative mechanisms that can be therapeutically induced or supplemented. On the other hand, preconditioning could be used as a therapeutic technique by inducing tolerance in individuals in whom ischaemic events are anticipated, such as high-risk surgical cohorts or patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage or transient ischaemic attack. Many articles have reviewed various features of ischaemic preconditioning, tolerance, and endogenous neuroprotection in the brain.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 In this Review, we give a brief overview of preconditioning, including ischaemic preconditioning, and its clinical potential and discuss the therapeutic exploitation of endogenous neuroprotection. Additionally, we hope to expand the neurocentric view of preconditioning and tolerance held by neuroscientists and neurologists to include the immune system.

Section snippets

Induction of ischaemic tolerance

Many pathological pathways converge on shared pathways of cell injury, death, and repair. For example, although the causes of acute neurodegeneration (eg, stroke) and chronic neurodegeneration (eg, Parkinson's disease) are different, the mechanisms of cell injury—including excitotoxicity, inflammation, and apoptosis—overlap,19 as do the pathways of survival and regeneration. Therefore, the options for inducing preconditioning and tolerance are not specific to the type of injury, which is

Genomic reprogramming

The induction of ischaemic tolerance is accompanied by substantial change in gene expression, suggesting that preconditioning stimulates a fundamental genomic reprogramming of cells that confers cytoprotection and survival.6 The genomic response after ischaemic preconditioning is a signature of the complex interplay of multiple signalling pathways. These highly specialised pathways in different cell types of the brain seem to refine the cellular and systemic response to combat the noxious

Hypoxia-inducible factor: a regulator of ischaemic preconditioning?

One of the key regulators of the genomic response after ischaemic preconditioning is the transcriptional activator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). This protein is a heterodimer with an unstable α-subunit (HIFα) and a stable β-subunit (HIFβ).64 HIF is regulated by an evolutionarily conserved pathway mediated by oxygen-dependent post-translational hydroxylation of HIFα. Under typical oxygen conditions, HIFα becomes hydroxylated at two prolyl residues by members of the prolyl-4 hydroxylase domain

Improving outcome after stroke

The endogenous response aimed at improving outcome after decreased substrate delivery to the brain (ie, ischaemia), which is at least partly mediated by HIF, relies on four basic actions: increased substrate delivery, decreased energy use, antagonised mechanisms of damage, and improved recovery. Preconditioning can modulate all four of these actions.

Immunological tolerance

Activation of the innate immune response is a consequence of stroke, and preclinical data indicate that inflammation in the immediate post-stroke period contributes to ischaemic brain injury.162 Clinical data attribute a detrimental role to post-stroke inflammation. The most convincing of these data came from a trial aimed at preventing leucocyte influx into ischaemic brain tissue. The protein used in this trial, however, induced a systemic inflammatory response associated with worse outcome.163

Clinical use of preconditioning

Preconditioning has been successful as an experimental procedure to identify mechanisms for brain protection and regeneration. Important examples of strategies to modulate these mechanisms include erythropoietin, activators of mitochondrial KATP channels, and volatile anaesthetics.

Because of the high risk of neurological complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy, patients scheduled for these procedures could potentially benefit from therapeutic

Clinical use: challenges and opportunities

A central belief in preconditioning research is that the preconditioning stimulus must be sub-threshold and should not cause damage. The postulated dose response of the preconditioning stimulus therefore ranges from no response at low intensities to the protected state at higher intensities; a further increase in stimulus intensity will cause overt damage. The therapeutic range of preconditioning is narrow.4, 71 Most preconditioning studies are short in duration, with limited periods of

Conclusions

Preconditioning (ie, induced tolerance) is an experimental technique in which protective and regenerative mechanisms of the brain can be isolated from deleterious mechanisms. The molecular signalling cascades of endogenous brain protection—from stimulus and sensor to transducers and effectors—are being identified (figure 2). Research has led to the discovery of several promising strategies for the treatment of patients with acute CNS injury. Additionally, studies of preconditioning have led to

Search strategy and selection criteria

References for this Review were identified through searches of PubMed by use of search terms that included “preconditioning”, “ischemic tolerance”, “neuroprotection”, “brain repair”, “brain ischemia”, “brain hypoxia”, and “stroke” (“tolerance” and “preconditioning” were common modifiers), with various search periods (from January, 1980, to December, 2008). The full list of search terms is available from the author on request. The bibliographies of the most recent articles were also

References (227)

  • M Weih et al.

    Induction of ischemic tolerance in rat cortical neurons by 3-nitropropionic acid: chemical preconditioning

    Neurosci Lett

    (1999)
  • AN Clarkson

    Anesthetic-mediated protection/preconditioning during cerebral ischemia

    Life Sci

    (2007)
  • L Wang et al.

    Inhalational anesthetics as preconditioning agents in ischemic brain

    Curr Opin Pharmacol

    (2008)
  • M Bernaudin et al.

    Brain genomic response following hypoxia and re-oxygenation in the neonatal rat. Identification of genes that might contribute to hypoxia-induced ischemic tolerance

    J Biol Chem

    (2002)
  • MP Stenzel-Poore et al.

    Effect of ischaemic preconditioning on genomic response to cerebral ischaemia: similarity to neuroprotective strategies in hibernation and hypoxia-tolerant states

    Lancet

    (2003)
  • Y Tang et al.

    Effect of hypoxic preconditioning on brain genomic response before and following ischemia in the adult mouse: identification of potential neuroprotective candidates for stroke

    Neurobiol Dis

    (2006)
  • F Yildirim et al.

    Inhibition of histone deacetylation protects wildtype but not gelsolin-deficient mice from ischemic brain injury

    Exp Neurol

    (2008)
  • WG Kaelin et al.

    Oxygen sensing by metazoans: the central role of the HIF hydroxylase pathway

    Mol Cell

    (2008)
  • K Ruscher et al.

    Induction of hypoxia inducible factor 1 by oxygen glucose deprivation is attenuated by hypoxic preconditioning in rat cultured neurons

    Neurosci Lett

    (1998)
  • HJ Marti et al.

    Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor expression precedes neovascularization after cerebral ischemia

    Am J Pathol

    (2000)
  • LR Aminova et al.

    Prosurvival and prodeath effects of hypoxia-inducible factor-1alpha stabilization in a murine hippocampal cell line

    J Biol Chem

    (2005)
  • AC Epstein et al.

    C. elegans EGL-9 and mammalian homologs define a family of dioxygenases that regulate HIF by prolyl hydroxylation

    Cell

    (2001)
  • A Siddiq et al.

    Hypoxia-inducible factor prolyl 4-hydroxylase inhibition. A target for neuroprotection in the central nervous system

    J Biol Chem

    (2005)
  • CF Xia et al.

    Postischemic infusion of adrenomedullin protects against ischemic stroke by inhibiting apoptosis and promoting angiogenesis

    Exp Neurol

    (2006)
  • SH Lee et al.

    Ischemic preconditioning enhances neurogenesis in the subventricular zone

    Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • JF Kurtzke

    The current neurologic burden of illness and injury in the United States

    Neurology

    (1982)
  • D Hirtz et al.

    How common are the “common” neurologic disorders?

    Neurology

    (2007)
  • G Trendelenburg et al.

    Neuroprotective role of astrocytes in cerebral ischemia: focus on ischemic preconditioning

    Glia

    (2005)
  • MP Stenzel-Poore et al.

    Preconditioning reprograms the response to ischemic injury and primes the emergence of unique endogenous neuroprotective phenotypes: a speculative synthesis

    Stroke

    (2007)
  • SL Stevens et al.

    Toll-like receptors and tolerance to ischaemic injury in the brain

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (2006)
  • JM Gidday

    Cerebral preconditioning and ischaemic tolerance

    Nat Rev Neurosci

    (2006)
  • K Kariko et al.

    Inhibition of toll-like receptor and cytokine signaling–a unifying theme in ischemic tolerance

    J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab

    (2004)
  • R Simon et al.

    Endogenous mechanisms of neuroprotection

    Epilepsia

    (2007)
  • TP Obrenovitch

    Molecular physiology of preconditioning-induced brain tolerance to ischemia

    Physiol Rev

    (2008)
  • MA Perez-Pinzon et al.

    Role of reactive oxygen species and protein kinase C in ischemic tolerance in the brain

    Antiox Redox Signal

    (2005)
  • AE O'Duffy et al.

    Killer proteases and little strokes–how the things that do not kill you make you stronger

    J Cerebr Blood Flow Metabol

    (2007)
  • R Ran et al.

    Hypoxia preconditioning in the brain

    Develop Neurosci

    (2005)
  • T Kirino

    Ischemic tolerance

    J Cerebr Blood Flow Metabol

    (2002)
  • VL Dawson et al.

    Mining for survival genes

    Biochem Soc Trans

    (2006)
  • RL Noble

    The development of resistance by rats and guinea pigs to amounts of trauma usually fatal

    Am J Physiol

    (1943)
  • A Janoff

    Alterations in lysosomes (intracellular enzymes) during shock; effects of preconditioning (tolerance) and protective drugs

    Int Anesthesiol Clinics

    (1964)
  • Y Birnbaum et al.

    Ischemic preconditioning at a distance: reduction of myocardial infarct size by partial reduction of blood supply combined with rapid stimulation of the gastrocnemius muscle in the rabbit

    Circulation

    (1997)
  • DJ Hausenloy et al.

    Remote ischaemic preconditioning: underlying mechanisms and clinical application

    Cardiovasc Res

    (2008)
  • S Tokuno et al.

    Spontaneous ischemic events in the brain and heart adapt the hearts of severely atherosclerotic mice to ischemia

    Arterioscler Thrombosis Vasc Biol

    (2002)
  • ZA Ali et al.

    Remote ischemic preconditioning reduces myocardial and renal injury after elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a randomized controlled trial

    Circulation

    (2007)
  • X Meng et al.

    Myocardial gene reprogramming associated with a cardiac cross-resistant state induced by LPS preconditioning

    Am J Physiol

    (1998)
  • HL Rosenzweig et al.

    Endotoxin preconditioning prevents cellular inflammatory response during ischemic neuroprotection in mice

    Stroke

    (2004)
  • K Furuya et al.

    Differences in infarct evolution between lipopolysaccharide-induced tolerant and nontolerant conditions to focal cerebral ischemia

    J Neurosurg

    (2005)
  • T Kawano et al.

    iNOS-derived NO and nox2-derived superoxide confer tolerance to excitotoxic brain injury through peroxynitrite

    J Cerebr Blood Flow Metab

    (2007)
  • MW Riepe et al.

    Acetylsalicylic acid increases tolerance against hypoxic and chemical hypoxia

    Stroke

    (1997)
  • Cited by (501)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text