References for this Review were identified through searches of PubMed by use of search terms that included “preconditioning”, “ischemic tolerance”, “neuroprotection”, “brain repair”, “brain ischemia”, “brain hypoxia”, and “stroke” (“tolerance” and “preconditioning” were common modifiers), with various search periods (from January, 1980, to December, 2008). The full list of search terms is available from the author on request. The bibliographies of the most recent articles were also
ReviewPreconditioning and tolerance against cerebral ischaemia: from experimental strategies to clinical use
Introduction
Organisms have evolved mechanisms to protect against tissue damage and to compensate (or even regenerate) in the event of injury. The two most elementary challenges, and thus the greatest evolutionary pressures, for living organisms are infection and deprivation of substrate or energy. Pathophysiological research has focused on mechanisms by which tissue is damaged by noxious stimuli or processes and how to prevent this injury.
To identify endogenous mechanisms of protection and repair, and to make use of these mechanisms therapeutically, biomedical investigators have developed preconditioning strategies. Preconditioning is a procedure by which a noxious stimulus near to but below the threshold of damage is applied to the tissue. Shortly after preconditioning or after a delay, the organ (and therefore the organism) develops resistance to, or tolerance of, the same, similar, or even different noxious stimuli given beyond the threshold of damage. Preconditioning thereby protects against subsequent injury.
Ischaemic brain injuries, resulting either from global or focal decreases in perfusion, are among the most common and important causes of disability and death worldwide. The consequences of global cerebral ischaemia after cardiac arrest (and successful resuscitation), focal occlusions or disruption of brain vessels (ie, stroke, including subarachnoid haemorrhage and intraparenchymatous haemorrhage), and ischaemic brain damage after cardiac or brain surgery affect many millions of people in the USA alone.1, 2 Research into preconditioning aims at developing new therapeutic approaches to benefit these patients. On the one hand, preconditioning is an attractive experimental strategy to identify endogenous protective or regenerative mechanisms that can be therapeutically induced or supplemented. On the other hand, preconditioning could be used as a therapeutic technique by inducing tolerance in individuals in whom ischaemic events are anticipated, such as high-risk surgical cohorts or patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage or transient ischaemic attack. Many articles have reviewed various features of ischaemic preconditioning, tolerance, and endogenous neuroprotection in the brain.3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 In this Review, we give a brief overview of preconditioning, including ischaemic preconditioning, and its clinical potential and discuss the therapeutic exploitation of endogenous neuroprotection. Additionally, we hope to expand the neurocentric view of preconditioning and tolerance held by neuroscientists and neurologists to include the immune system.
Section snippets
Induction of ischaemic tolerance
Many pathological pathways converge on shared pathways of cell injury, death, and repair. For example, although the causes of acute neurodegeneration (eg, stroke) and chronic neurodegeneration (eg, Parkinson's disease) are different, the mechanisms of cell injury—including excitotoxicity, inflammation, and apoptosis—overlap,19 as do the pathways of survival and regeneration. Therefore, the options for inducing preconditioning and tolerance are not specific to the type of injury, which is
Genomic reprogramming
The induction of ischaemic tolerance is accompanied by substantial change in gene expression, suggesting that preconditioning stimulates a fundamental genomic reprogramming of cells that confers cytoprotection and survival.6 The genomic response after ischaemic preconditioning is a signature of the complex interplay of multiple signalling pathways. These highly specialised pathways in different cell types of the brain seem to refine the cellular and systemic response to combat the noxious
Hypoxia-inducible factor: a regulator of ischaemic preconditioning?
One of the key regulators of the genomic response after ischaemic preconditioning is the transcriptional activator hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF). This protein is a heterodimer with an unstable α-subunit (HIFα) and a stable β-subunit (HIFβ).64 HIF is regulated by an evolutionarily conserved pathway mediated by oxygen-dependent post-translational hydroxylation of HIFα. Under typical oxygen conditions, HIFα becomes hydroxylated at two prolyl residues by members of the prolyl-4 hydroxylase domain
Improving outcome after stroke
The endogenous response aimed at improving outcome after decreased substrate delivery to the brain (ie, ischaemia), which is at least partly mediated by HIF, relies on four basic actions: increased substrate delivery, decreased energy use, antagonised mechanisms of damage, and improved recovery. Preconditioning can modulate all four of these actions.
Immunological tolerance
Activation of the innate immune response is a consequence of stroke, and preclinical data indicate that inflammation in the immediate post-stroke period contributes to ischaemic brain injury.162 Clinical data attribute a detrimental role to post-stroke inflammation. The most convincing of these data came from a trial aimed at preventing leucocyte influx into ischaemic brain tissue. The protein used in this trial, however, induced a systemic inflammatory response associated with worse outcome.163
Clinical use of preconditioning
Preconditioning has been successful as an experimental procedure to identify mechanisms for brain protection and regeneration. Important examples of strategies to modulate these mechanisms include erythropoietin, activators of mitochondrial KATP channels, and volatile anaesthetics.
Because of the high risk of neurological complications associated with coronary artery bypass grafting and carotid endarterectomy, patients scheduled for these procedures could potentially benefit from therapeutic
Clinical use: challenges and opportunities
A central belief in preconditioning research is that the preconditioning stimulus must be sub-threshold and should not cause damage. The postulated dose response of the preconditioning stimulus therefore ranges from no response at low intensities to the protected state at higher intensities; a further increase in stimulus intensity will cause overt damage. The therapeutic range of preconditioning is narrow.4, 71 Most preconditioning studies are short in duration, with limited periods of
Conclusions
Preconditioning (ie, induced tolerance) is an experimental technique in which protective and regenerative mechanisms of the brain can be isolated from deleterious mechanisms. The molecular signalling cascades of endogenous brain protection—from stimulus and sensor to transducers and effectors—are being identified (figure 2). Research has led to the discovery of several promising strategies for the treatment of patients with acute CNS injury. Additionally, studies of preconditioning have led to
Search strategy and selection criteria
References (227)
- et al.
Endogenous neuroprotection: mitochondria as gateways to cerebral preconditioning?
Neuropharmacology
(2008) - et al.
Ischemic tolerance and endogenous neuroprotection
Trends Neurosci
(2003) Mechanisms of neuroprotection during ischemic preconditioning: lessons from anoxic tolerance
Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol
(2007)- et al.
Neuronal ischaemic preconditioning
Trends Pharmacol Sci
(2000) - et al.
Pathobiology of ischaemic stroke: an integrated view
Trends Neurosci
(1999) - et al.
Limb remote-preconditioning protects against focal ischemia in rats and contradicts the dogma of therapeutic time windows for preconditioning
Neuroscience
(2008) - et al.
Remote organ ischemic preconditioning protect brain from ischemic damage following asphyxial cardiac arrest
Neurosci Lett
(2006) - et al.
Effect of remote ischaemic preconditioning on myocardial injury in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a randomised controlled trial
Lancet
(2007) - et al.
Induction of endogenous tissue antioxidant enzyme activity attenuates myocardial reperfusion injury
J Surg Res
(1990) - et al.
Lipopolysaccharide-induced ischemic tolerance is associated with increased levels of ceramide in brain and in plasma
Brain Res
(2001)