Elsevier

Biochemical Pharmacology

Volume 79, Issue 1, 1 January 2010, Pages 48-56
Biochemical Pharmacology

The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol is a negative allosteric modulator of the human A3 adenosine receptor

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bcp.2009.07.024Get rights and content

Abstract

Studies of endogenous cannabinoid agonists, such as 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG), have revealed their potential to exert modulatory actions on other receptor systems in addition to their ability to activate cannabinoid receptors. This study investigated the effect of cannabinoid ligands on the human adenosine A3 (hA3R) receptor. The endocannabinoid 2-AG was able to inhibit agonist ([125I]N6-(4-amino-3-iodobenzyl) adenosine-5′-(N-methyluronamide) – [125I] AB MECA) binding at the hA3R. This inhibition occurred over a narrow range of ligand concentration and was characterized by high Hill coefficients suggesting a non-competitive interaction. Furthermore, in the presence of 2-AG, the rate of [125I] AB MECA dissociation was increased, consistent with an action as a negative allosteric modulator of the hA3R. Moreover, by measuring intracellular cAMP levels, we demonstrate that 2-AG decreases both the potency of an agonist at the hA3R and the basal signalling of this receptor. Since the hA3R has been shown to be expressed in astrocytes and microglia, these findings may be particularly relevant in certain pathological states such as cerebral ischemia where levels of 2-AG and anandamide are raised.

Introduction

The cannabinoid and adenosine pathways have overlapping roles in both the modulation of neurotransmitter release in the central nervous system and modulation of the immune response [1], [2]. The endogenous nucleoside adenosine activates four distinct adenosine receptors, which all belong to the family of G protein coupled receptors (GPCR): the adenosine A1, A2A, A2B and A3 receptor [1]. Of these the adenosine A3 receptor is the most recently discovered and has a wide distribution, with its mRNA being present in testis, lung, heart, placenta, brain, spleen, liver, uterus, proximal colon and bladder [3], [4], [5]. There is now extensive evidence for the involvement of the A3 adenosine receptor in many disease pathways [6]. The A3 receptor has been implicated in the modulation of inflammatory effects, for example stimulation of the A3 receptor expressed in RBL-2H3 rat mast cells with adenosine leads to degranulation and may protect mast cells from apoptosis [7]. The A3 receptor also plays an important role in both neuroprotective and neurodegenerative effects in the brain [6].

Of several endogenous agonists for cannabinoid receptors identified thus far the most notable are anandamide and 2-arachidonylglycerol (2-AG) [2]. Their physiological effects are mainly mediated via the cannabinoid receptors CB1 and CB2[2]. These endocannabinoids have been implicated in both neuromodulatory roles and immunomodulatory functions (e.g. through the regulation of cytokine release and immune cell migration) [8]. CB1 receptor expression levels are highest in the CNS, whereas CB2 receptors have a close association with the immune system and mRNA has been detected in a wide variety of immune cells and tissues such as mast cells and microglia [2]. Interestingly, the endocannabinoid 2-AG has been shown to decrease the immunological activation of guinea pig mast cells in a mechanism mediated by CB2 receptors and opposite to the effect mediated by adenosine described above [9]. Consequently, it was of interest to investigate the potential for cannabinoid ligands to modulate the action of the adenosine A3 receptor.

It should be noted that a number of studies have implicated other sites of action of these endocannabinoids in addition to their ability to activate cannabinoid CB1 and CB2 receptors [10]. For example, neurobehavioural studies carried out in cannabinoid CB1 knockout mice showed that regardless of the lack of CB1 receptors, anandamide still exerted cannabimimetic-like activity, even though the CB1 receptor is believed to be the only receptor for cannabinoids in the brain [11]. Interestingly, cannabinoids inhibit the production of cytokines such as tumour necrosis factor-α from activated microglial cells but this activity does not involve any known CB receptor subtype for it occurs at high concentrations of ligands [12], [13]. Furthermore anandamide has been shown to inhibit ligand binding to central 5-HT receptors and muscarinic acetylcholine receptors [14], [15], [16]. In both cases this has been shown to be a direct effect, and not mediated by the interaction of the endocannabinoid with either CB1 or CB2 receptors. This is particularly relevant for disease states such as ischemia and schizophrenia where the local concentration of the endocannabinoid can be elevated [17], [18], [19], [20]. Given that cannabinoid receptors and adenosine A3 receptors are co-localised, for example in glia and immune cells such as mast cells [2], [6], [21], [22], it is possible that elevated levels of endocannabinoids may exert a ‘spill-over’ effect on adenosine receptor binding and/or functional properties. In the present study we focus on the hA3 receptor and demonstrate that the endocannabinoid ligands do indeed have a direct effect on the ligand binding of hA3 receptors. Furthermore, this study provides evidence that this interaction is non-competitive and independent of an interaction with either CB1 or CB2 receptors. The inhibition of both agonist and antagonist binding is characterised by steep Hill slopes over a narrow concentration range. This effect is specific to the A3 receptor, with no effect of cannabinoid ligands being observed on the ligand binding ability of A1 or A2A adenosine receptors. Moreover, measuring intracellular cAMP levels, we demonstrate that 2-AG decreases both the potency of an agonist at the hA3R and the basal signalling of this receptor. An investigation of ligand dissociation kinetics demonstrated that eicosanoid ligands, including the endogenous ligands anandamide and 2-AG, are negative allosteric modulators of ligand binding at the adenosine A3 receptor.

Section snippets

Materials

[125I] AB MECA was purchased from PerkinElmer BV, Groningen, NL. The following cannabinoid ligands were obtained from Tocris Ltd., Avonmouth, UK: ACEA, N-(2-chloroethyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide; ACPA, N-(cyclopropyl)-5Z,8Z,11Z,14Z-eicosatetraenamide; AM 251, N-(piperidin-1-yl)-5-(4-iodophenyl)-1-(2,4-dichlorophenyl)-4-methyl-1H-pyrazole-3-carboxamide; AM630, 6-iodo-2-methyl-1-[2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl]-1H-indol-3-yl](4-methoxyphenyl)methanone; CP55940,

Saturation and inhibition binding assays in membranes of CHO cells stably expressing the human hA3 adenosine receptor

Saturation binding experiments performed for [125I] AB MECA at the hA3R expressed in CHO membranes yielded a Kd of 1.86 ± 0.69 nM and a Bmax of 1.16 ± 0.28 pmol/mg (Table 2). At the working concentration of 0.1 nM [125I] AB MECA, binding to the hA3R was completely abolished with the addition of 100 μM GTP indicating that only the high affinity (G protein-coupled) state of the receptor was occupied at this concentration (data not shown). To examine the effects of various cannabinoid ligands (Fig. 1) on

Discussion

This study demonstrates a direct interaction of endocannabinoid ligands with the adenosine A3 receptor which leads to the inhibition of ligand binding. Our study suggests that this is an allosteric effect rather than a direct competition with the orthosteric binding site of the A3 receptor. Accordingly kinetic studies and functional studies demonstrate that eicosanoids act as allosteric inhibitors at the A3 receptor.

The direct effects of endocannabinoid ligands tested at the A3 receptor

Acknowledgment

We thank Prof C.E. Müller (University of Bonn, Germany) for providing us with [3H] PSB-11.

References (39)

  • B.B. Fredholm et al.

    International Union of Pharmacology. XXV. Nomenclature and classification of adenosine receptors

    Pharmacol Rev

    (2001)
  • A.C. Howlett et al.

    International Union of Pharmacology. XXVII. Classification of cannabinoid receptors

    Pharmacol Rev

    (2002)
  • Q.Y. Zhou et al.

    Molecular cloning and characterization of an adenosine receptor: the A3 adenosine receptor

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1992)
  • C.A. Salvatore et al.

    Molecular cloning and characterization of the human A3 adenosine receptor

    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A

    (1993)
  • A.K. Dixon et al.

    Tissue distribution of adenosine receptor mRNAs in the rat

    Br J Pharmacol

    (1996)
  • Z. Gao et al.

    A3 adenosine receptor activation triggers phosphorylation of protein kinase B and protects rat basophilic leukemia 2H3 mast cells from apoptosis

    Mol Pharmacol

    (2001)
  • A. Vannacci et al.

    The endocannabinoid 2-arachidonylglycerol decreases the immunological activation of Guinea pig mast cells: involvement of nitric oxide and eicosanoids

    J Pharmacol Exp Ther

    (2004)
  • R.G. Pertwee

    The therapeutic potential of drugs that target cannabinoid receptors or modulate the tissue levels or actions of endocannabinoids

    Aaps J

    (2005)
  • V. Di Marzo et al.

    Levels, metabolism, and pharmacological activity of anandamide in CB(1) cannabinoid receptor knockout mice: evidence for non-CB(1), non-CB(2) receptor-mediated actions of anandamide in mouse brain

    J Neurochem

    (2000)
  • Cited by (40)

    • Allosteric binding cooperativity in a kinetic context

      2023, Drug Discovery Today
      Citation Excerpt :

      There are studies in the literature showing the effect of allosteric modulators on the binding kinetics of orthosteric ligands. As examples, we can mention values included in Table 7 of 6 showing the decrease in the dissociation rate constant of the adenosine A3 [125I]-I-AB-MECA agonist exerted by some allosteric modulators, namely, 43% (VUF5455),7 46% (DU124183),17 58% (2-AG),18 and 47% (HMA).19 Interestingly, the HMA allosteric modulator increased 1.6-fold the dissociation rate constant of the [3H]-PSB-11 antagonist.19

    • 2-Arachidonoylglycerol: A signaling lipid with manifold actions in the brain

      2018, Progress in Lipid Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      Of note, also for the other major endocannabinoid AEA different intracellular transporters (e.g., different FABPs and heat shock protein 70) have been identified that ferry it to the correct final destination [143], as well as extracellular transporters like microvesicles that ferry it through the synaptic cleft [177]. Interestingly, several reports indicate that 2-AG may also produce physiological effects independently of CB1 and CB2 receptors, for instance by binding to and activating GABAA [178], PPARγ [179], Adenosine A3 [180], TRPV1 [181], and GPR55 [182]. For example, it has been shown that 2-AG potentiates GABAA receptor function at low GABA concentrations, which leads to inhibition of motility [178].

    • The endocannabinoid system, a novel and key participant in acupuncture's multiple beneficial effects

      2017, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, 2-AG has been reported to be a negative allosteric modulator of the human A3 adenosine receptor (hA3R) and to decrease the basal signaling of this receptor. Since the hA3R is expressed in astrocytes and microglia, it was suggested that these findings may be relevant in certain pathological conditions, such as cerebral ischemia, in which levels of endocannabinoids are raised (Lane et al., 2010). Wang and colleagues reported that EA preconditioning-induced rapid tolerance to focal cerebral ischemia in rats was reversed by DPCPX, a selective A1 receptor antagonist, suggesting that this beneficial effect of EA may have been mediated through an adenosine A1 receptor-related mechanism (Wang et al., 2005).

    • Effects of Cannabis and Cannabinoids in the Human Nervous System

      2013, The Effects of Drug Abuse on the Human Nervous System
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text