Interfacial inhibitors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.07.032Get rights and content

Abstract

Targeting macromolecular interface is a general mechanism by which natural products inactivate macromolecular complexes by stabilizing normally transient intermediates. Demonstrating interfacial inhibition mechanism ultimately relies on the resolution of drug-macromolecule structures. This review focuses on medicinal drugs that trap protein–DNA complexes by binding at protein–DNA interfaces. It provides proof-of-concept and detailed structural and mechanistic examples for topoisomerase inhibitors and HIV integrase inhibitors. Additional examples of recent interfacial inhibitors for protein–DNA interfaces are provided, as well as prospects for targeting previously ‘undruggable’ targets including transcription, replication and chromatin remodeling complexes. References and discussion are included for interfacial inhibitors of protein–protein interfaces.

Section snippets

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge support from the Center for Cancer Research, the Intramural Program of the National Cancer Institute (Z01 BC 006161 and Z01 BC 007333) and the National Institute of General Medical Sciences Postdoctoral Research Associate (PRAT) Program, US National Institutes of Health.

References and notes (50)

  • C. Jaxel et al.

    J. Biol. Chem.

    (1991)
  • Y. Pommier et al.

    Trends Pharmacol. Sci.

    (2005)
  • A.F. Hohmann et al.

    Trends Genetics: TIG

    (2014)
  • Y. Pommier et al.

    Chem. Biol.

    (2010)
  • J.M. Fortune et al.

    Prog. Nucl. Acid Res. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • J.E. Chrencik et al.

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2004)
  • M. Metifiot et al.

    Adv. Pharmacol.

    (2013)
  • P. Gao et al.

    Cell

    (2013)
  • T.J. Miles et al.

    Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett.

    (2013)
  • J.A. Huberman

    Cell

    (1981)
  • C.D. Kaplan et al.

    Mol. Cell.

    (2008)
  • R.K. Agrawal et al.

    Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol.

    (1999)
  • M. Laurberg et al.

    J. Mol. Biol.

    (2000)
  • J.M. Harms et al.

    Mol. Cell

    (2008)
  • G. Capranico et al.

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1990)
  • Y. Pommier et al.

    Nucleic Acids Res.

    (1991)
  • B.L. Staker et al.

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.

    (2002)
  • C.C. Wu et al.

    Science

    (2011)
  • L. Renault et al.

    Nature

    (2003)
  • Y. Pommier et al.

    Curr. Med. Chem. Anti-cancer Agents

    (2005)
  • Y. Pommier et al.

    Nat. Rev. Drug Disc.

    (2012)
  • D. Kesters et al.

    EMBO Rep.

    (2013)
  • B. Gigant et al.

    Nature

    (2005)
  • S.M. Vos et al.

    Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol.

    (2011)
  • Y. Pommier

    ACS Chem. Biol.

    (2013)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Substituted 1,5-naphthyridine derivatives as novel antileishmanial agents. Synthesis and biological evaluation

      2018, European Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
      Citation Excerpt :

      The reaction without catalyst did not work and the starting products were recovered. However, the use of trifluorboroetherate as Lewis acid catalyst gave us good results: the optimal ones were when 2 equivalents of Lewis acid were used and only 2,4-disubstituted 1,5-naphthyridines 17–31 were regioselectively obtained (Chart 2) when terminal alkynes were used (R2 = H, Chart 1), while the formation of the other regioisomers, namely 2,3-disubstituted 1,5-naphthyridines was not observed [27]. It is noteworthy that not only terminal alkynes 10–14 (Chart 1) can be used for the synthesis of 1,5-naphthyridines 17–31 but also internal alkyne 15 is appropriate for the formation of corresponding heterocyclic compounds, such as naphthyridine 32 (Chart 2).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text