Behavioural PharmacologyIntranasal cocaine functions as reinforcer on a progressive ratio schedule in humans
Introduction
Cocaine dependence continues to be a significant public health concern worldwide. Data from the United States indicate that approximately 2 million Americans over the age of 12 report current cocaine use (Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration [SAMHSA], 2009). In the European Union, it is estimated that 1.5 million people report current cocaine use (European Monitoring Centre for Drugs and Drug Addiction [EMCDDA], 2009). Importantly, despite prevention and intervention efforts, prevalence of cocaine use remains stable (e.g., SAMHSA, 2009). Moreover, cocaine use has come to be associated with a host of mental and physical health problems (for reviews see Chen and Lin, 2009, Cregler, 1989). While the use of smoked cocaine (i.e., crack) has received much of the focus of epidemiological research (e.g., Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2005, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, 2007), it is important to recognize that a significant number of cocaine users in the United States and Europe do not smoke cocaine (up to 2/3 of cocaine users; Foltin and Haney, 2004; c.f., Gossop et al., 1994, Prinzleve et al., 2004). In addition, many report their initial experience with cocaine to be via intranasal insufflation (Foltin and Haney, 2004, Gorelick, 1992, van der Meer Sanchez and Nappo, 2007).
The pharmacodynamic effects of cocaine have been studied extensively following oral, intranasal, smoked and intravenous administration in humans (e.g., Fischman, 1984, Foltin et al., 1988, Foltin et al., 1990, Rush et al., 1999). Cocaine occupies the dopamine transporter regardless of route, which produces increases in positive subjective drug effects, heart rate and blood pressure, but with different rates of onset observed as a function of route of administration (Foltin and Fischman, 1991, Oliveto et al., 1995, Resnick et al., 1977, Volkow et al., 2000). The reinforcing effects of cocaine have also been demonstrated under a number behavioral arrangements (e.g., drug versus alternative reinforcer choice, drug versus placebo choice, multiple choice procedure, fixed ratio and progressive ratio schedules), but primarily with smoked or intravenous administration (Donny et al., 2004, Fischman and Schuster, 1982, Haney et al., 1998, Haney et al., 2006, Hart et al., 2007, Sobel et al., 2004, Walsh et al., 2010). The reinforcing effects of intranasal cocaine have not been examined as extensively and have mainly been studied using choice procedures (Higgins et al., 1994, Lile et al., 2004, Rush et al., 2010, Stoops et al., 2010).
The purpose of this experiment was to determine the reinforcing effects of a range of doses of intranasal cocaine (4 [placebo], 15, 30 and 45 mg) on a progressive ratio schedule of responding because cocaine is used intranasally by a significant number of individuals throughout the world and the reinforcing effects of intranasal cocaine have been examined under limited conditions. We hypothesized that cocaine would function as a reinforcer (i.e., engender higher break points than placebo). To more fully characterize the effects of intranasal cocaine, a battery of subject-rated and physiological measures was included.
Section snippets
Subjects
Eight non-treatment seeking adult subjects (7 men, 1 woman; 7 Black, 1 White) with recent histories of cocaine use (i.e., cocaine positive urine during initial screening) who met criteria for cocaine dependence as determined by a computerized version of the Structured Clinical Interview for the DSM-IV completed the protocol. Seven of these subjects reported smoking cocaine as their primary route of administration. One subject reported cocaine insufflation as her primary route or administration.
Break point
A significant effect of cocaine dose was observed on break point for cocaine and break point for money from the Progressive Ratio Procedure (F3, 21 values > 7.25, P values < 0.01; Fig. 1 shows break point for cocaine). Post hoc analysis revealed that 15 and 45 mg cocaine significantly increased break point for cocaine and significantly decreased break point for money.
Subject-rated measures
A significant effect of cocaine dose was observed on one item from the Drug-Effect Questionnaire: Sluggish, Fatigued or Lazy (F3, 21 =
Discussion
The results of the present experiment demonstrate that intranasal cocaine functions as a reinforcer on a progressive ratio schedule of reinforcement in humans. Trends were observed for cocaine to dose-dependently increase several subjective measures (i.e., scores on the Stimulant subscale of the Adjective Rating Scale and ratings of Good Effects). Cocaine doses were safe and well tolerated.
A number of other studies have shown that intranasal cocaine is chosen to a greater degree than placebo or
Conclusion
Intranasal cocaine functioned as a reinforcer on a progressive ratio schedule of responding in the present study, which is consistent with the results of previous studies with intravenous cocaine. Drug self-administration seems to be the best predictor from the human laboratory of treatment success (Haney and Spealman, 2008), thus, methods similar to those reported here can be used to test potential behavioral and pharmacological therapies for cocaine dependence. Moreover, these results suggest
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by NIDA Grant R21 DA 024089 to WWS as well as by internal funding to the CRDOC at the University of Kentucky Chandler Medical Center. These funding agencies had no role in study design, data collection or analysis or preparation and submission of the manuscript. The authors declare no conflicts of interest relevant to this work. The authors wish to thank Michelle Gray, Bryan Hall, Erika Pike, Jennifer Schmedes and Sarah Veenema for expert technical assistance and
References (50)
- et al.
Intranasal cocaine in humans: effects of sex and menstrual cycle
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(2007) - et al.
The role of human drug self-administration procedures in the development of medications
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2008) - et al.
Intranasal cocaine in humans: acute tolerance, cardiovascular and subjective effects
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(2004) - et al.
Repeated intranasal cocaine administration: lack of tolerance to pressor effects
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(1988) - et al.
Demonstration of naturalistic methods for cocaine smoking by human volunteers
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(1990) - et al.
Smoked cocaine self-administration by humans is not reduced by large gabapentin maintenance doses
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2007) The influence of alternative reinforcers on cocaine use and abuse: a brief review
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
(1997)- et al.
Influence of an alternative reinforcer on human cocaine self-administration
Life Sci.
(1994) - et al.
A comparison of the reinforcing efficacy of 3, 4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, “ecstasy”) with cocaine in rhesus monkeys
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2005) - et al.
A double-blind, placebo-controlled outpatient trial of pergolide for cocaine dependence
Drug Alcohol Depend.
(2000)
Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats: a method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy
J. Neurosci. Meth.
Acute physiological and behavioral effects of oral cocaine in humans: a dose–response analysis
Drug Alcohol Depend.
The drug abuse screening test
Addict. Behav.
Safety, tolerability and subject-rated effects of acute intranasal cocaine administration during atomoxetine maintenance
Drug Alcohol Depend.
Monetary alternative reinforcers more effectively decrease intranasal cocaine choice than food alternative reinforcers
Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.
Effects of route of administration on cocaine induced dopamine transporter blockade in the human brain
Life Sci.
Cocaine abuse versus cocaine dependence: cocaine self-administration and pharmacodynamic response in the human laboratory
Drug Alcohol Depend.
Health consequences of illegal drug use
Curr. Opin. Psychiatry
Adverse health consequences of cocaine abuse
J. Natl. Med. Assoc.
Assessing the initiation of cocaine self-administration in humans during abstinence: effects of dose, alternative reinforcement, and priming
Psychopharmacology (Berl.)
2009 Annual report on the state of the drugs problem in Europe
The behavioral pharmacology of cocaine in humans
NIDA Res. Monogr.
Cocaine self-administration in humans
Fed. Proc.
Smoked and intravenous cocaine in humans: acute tolerance, cardiovascular and subjective effects
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.
Progression of dependence in male cocaine addicts
Am. J. Drug Alcohol Abuse
Cited by (21)
Human behavioral pharmacology of stimulant drugs: An update and narrative review
2022, Advances in PharmacologyN-Acetylcysteine reduces cocaine-cue attentional bias and differentially alters cocaine self-administration based on dosing order
2017, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :The attentional bias score served as the primary outcome measure for data analysis. A Drug Choice Procedure, identical to that used previously (Stoops et al., 2010), assessed the reinforcing effects of cocaine. Participants were given six opportunities at 30-min intervals to choose between the dose of cocaine that was sampled at the beginning of the session and an alternative reinforcer ($0.25 USD).
Anhedonia Is Associated with Poorer Outcomes in Contingency Management for Cocaine Use Disorder
2017, Journal of Substance Abuse TreatmentCitation Excerpt :The number of times the participant key pressed in choice A was the dependent variable, with fewer responses indicating motivational anhedonia. This task was selected for translational validity, and has previously been used to study motivation during drug administration, and in groups with substance dependence (e.g. Cherek, Lane, & Dougherty, 2002; Lane et al., 2005; Sigmon, Tidey, Badger, & Higgins, 2003; Stoops, Lile, Glaser, Hays, & Rush, 2010; Strickland, Lile, Rush, & Stoops, 2014). This task was hypothesized to tap motivational aspects of anhedonia (Der-Avakian & Markou, 2012), and consistent with this, similar measures have been shown to be sensitive to dopaminergic functioning in humans (Treadway et al., 2012; Wardle et al., 2011).
Differential sensitivity to learning from positive and negative outcomes in cocaine users
2016, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Participants with a current prescription for a centrally acting medication or dependence on any drug that could produce significant withdrawal symptoms (e.g., alcohol, opioids, benzodiazepines) were excluded. Screening procedures have been described in detail elsewhere (e.g., Stoops et al., 2010). Briefly, participants completed a battery of questionnaires, including a self-reported drug use history and the sensation-seeking and impulsivity subscales of the Zuckerman-Kuhlman Personality Questionnaire (ZKPQ; Zuckerman et al., 1993).
Development of a translational model to screen medications for cocaine use disorder II: Choice between intravenous cocaine and money in humans
2016, Drug and Alcohol DependenceCitation Excerpt :Likewise, a comparable range of food magnitudes was chosen for the monkey studies based on previously published animal studies and prior experience (e.g., Nader and Woolverton, 1991; Negus, 2003; Negus and Mello, 2003). Parameters for the concurrent, independent PR schedule were determined from our previous human laboratory studies that tested various ratio parameters in an effort to maximize drug-maintained responding while minimizing placebo self-administration (Sevak et al., 2010; Stoops et al., 2010b). We hypothesized that comparable patterns of cocaine choice would be demonstrated across species under these conditions (i.e., functional equivalence), and that specific cocaine dose and alternative reinforcer magnitude values would be determined for use in subsequent studies to evaluate medications for cocaine use disorder.
Conflation of cocaine seeking and cocaine taking responses in IV self-administration experiments in rats: Methodological and interpretational considerations
2013, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral ReviewsCitation Excerpt :For example, various schedules of reinforcement have been used with human subjects to control access to a cigarette that can be smoked at a preferred rate (Griffiths et al., 1976) or unit doses of alcohol (10 cc) that can be combined to create larger doses (Mendelson and Mello, 1966). Similarly, a PR procedure has been used with human cocaine users to control access to cocaine powder, a mirror and a razor blade (Stoops et al., 2010). The rate and pattern of intra-nasal cocaine use is under the subject's control.