Elsevier

Neuropharmacology

Volume 64, January 2013, Pages 240-247
Neuropharmacology

The mGlu5 positive allosteric modulator LSN2463359 differentially modulates motor, instrumental and cognitive effects of NMDA receptor antagonists in the rat

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.07.039Get rights and content

Abstract

Metabotropic glutamate 5 (mGlu5) receptors are known to functionally interact with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors at both neuronal and behavioural levels, in a manner that may be of relevance to the treatment of schizophrenia. We have previously described a novel mGlu5 positive allosteric modulator (PAM), LSN2463359 and provided evidence of its ability to attenuate aspects of the behavioural response to administration of the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist, SDZ 220,581. In addition, LSN2463359 was found to selectively attenuate reversal learning deficits observed in the neurodevelopmental MAM E17 model but not in the acute phencyclidine (PCP) model. In the present study, the interactions between this mGlu5 PAM and the NMDA receptor were explored further by assessing the effects of LSN2463359 against some of the motor, instrumental and cognitive effects induced by the non-competitive NMDA receptor antagonists PCP and MK-801, the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist SDZ 220,581 and the GluN2B selective NMDA receptor antagonist, Ro 63-1908. LSN2463359 had either no or minor impact on locomotor hyperactivity induced by either PCP or SDZ 220,581. However, in rats lever pressing for food rewards under a variable interval 30s schedule of instrumental responding, the drug clearly attenuated not only the suppression of response rate induced by SDZ 220,581 but also the stimulation of response rate induced by Ro 63-1908. In contrast, LSN2463359 failed to alter both of the instrumental effects induced by the open channel blockers PCP and MK-801. In addition, although PCP and SDZ 220,581 induced similar deficits in a discrimination and reversal learning task, LSN2463359 was again only able to reverse the deficit induced by SDZ 220,581. The results indicate that the interactions between mGlu5 and NMDA receptors are dependent on both the mechanism of the blockade of the receptor and the behavioural domain under investigation. Our work has implications for the preclinical use of NMDA receptor antagonists in the prediction of potential therapeutic efficacy in the search for novel treatments for schizophrenia. Positive allosteric modulators of the mGlu5 receptor certainly question the predictive validity of such approaches.

This article is part of a Special Issue entitled ‘Cognitive Enhancers’.

Highlights

► Behavioural interactions between mGlu5 PAM and NMDAR antagonists have been assessed. ► LSN2463359 had minor or no effect on PCP- and SDZ 220,581-increased motor activity. ► LSN2463359 attenuated SDZ 220,581 but not PCP deficits in instrumental responding. ► LSN2463359 attenuated SDZ 220,581 but not PCP deficits in reversal learning. ► mGlu5 and NMDAR interact in a behaviourally and pharmacologically specific manner.

Introduction

The glutamatergic hypothesis of schizophrenia originated from the discovery that the psychotomimetic agents, phencyclidine (PCP) and ketamine are antagonists of the N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor (Anis et al., 1983) capable of inducing psychotic states in volunteers and exacerbating the core psychotic and cognitive symptoms of patients with schizophrenia (Luby et al., 1959; Javitt and Zukin, 1991; Krystal et al., 1994; Lahti et al., 1995; Malhotra et al., 1996, 1997; Adler et al., 1998; Newcomer et al., 1999; Hetem et al., 2000; Krystal et al., 2000; Parwani et al., 2005). Now, several other lines of evidence suggest impaired NMDA receptor function in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia (Javitt and Zukin, 1991; Olney and Farber, 1995; Olney et al., 1999; Kristiansen et al., 2007; Zandi et al., 2011), which naturally prompts the hypothesis that restoration of NMDA receptor function might alleviate its symptoms. While direct pharmacological activation of NMDA receptors might be feasible, it is unlikely to be a viable treatment option because of the possibility of serious adverse events related to NMDA receptor overactivation, such as seizures and excitotoxicity (Lynch and Guttmann, 2002). An “indirect” activation of the NMDA receptor via glycine site modulation (Parsons et al., 1998; Wood, 2005; Yang and Svensson, 2008; Labrie and Roder, 2010) might be possible, although another alternative approach to the regulation of NMDA-mediated glutamatergic function would be to target metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptors (Moghaddam, 2004; Conn et al., 2009; Vinson and Conn, 2012). In particular, the mGlu5 receptor subtype is a close postsynaptic signalling partner of the NMDA receptor (Stoop et al., 2003; Homayoun and Moghaddam, 2006). Activation of mGlu5 receptors might therefore play an important role in enhancing NMDA receptor function in several brain regions of relevance to schizophrenia, with both in vitro and in vivo evidence from the hippocampus, striatum and prefrontal cortex suggesting this to be the case (Doherty et al., 1997, 2000; Awad et al., 2000; Attucci et al., 2001; Mannaioni et al., 2001; Pisani et al., 2001; Kinney et al., 2003; Collett and Collingridge, 2004; Kinney et al., 2005, 2006; Homayoun and Moghaddam, 2006; Lecourtier et al., 2007). Potential clinical applications in terms of antipsychotic efficacy of several mGlu5 positive allosteric modulator (PAM) molecules, such as CDPPB and ADX47273 have recently been reported (Kinney et al., 2005; Liu et al., 2008; Schlumberger et al., 2009, 2010; Stefani and Moghaddam, 2010).

We recently reported preclinical evidence for two novel mGlu5 PAMs, LSN2463359 and LSN2814617, with possible utility for the treatment of schizophrenia (Gilmour et al., in this issue). However, our initial studies raised an immediate question that the specificity of the effects of these molecules might partly depend on the rodent model of schizophrenia against which the molecules are assessed since LSN2463359 selectively attenuated reversal learning deficits observed in the neurodevelopmental MAM E17 model but not in the acute PCP model (Gastambide et al., 2012). In contrast to the lack of effect of LSN2463359 against a PCP-induced deficit, we have also previously observed that this molecule can attenuate behavioural deficits in instrumental responding and delayed matching to position induced by the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist SDZ 220,581 (Gilmour et al., in this issue). Thus, two issues are raised by this work – the nature of both the pharmacological mechanism of disruption and the behavioural domain under assessment – that need to be clarified in order to describe the behavioural effects of mGlu5 potentiators more precisely. To investigate this further, we assessed LSN2463359 (N-(1-methylethyl)-5-(pyridin-4-ylethynyl)pyridine-2-carboxamide) for its ability to modulate some of the motor, instrumental and cognitive effects induced by different classes of NMDA receptor antagonists, including those acting competitively and non-competitively, that may have relevance to some of the positive, negative and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.

Section snippets

Animals

Male Lister Hooded rats (Harlan, UK) were used as subjects in all studies. They were housed in standard housing conditions (four to eight per cage, 07.00 h–19.00 h light phase, controlled temperature and humidity, ad libitum water). All experiments were conducted in accordance with the regulations laid down in the United Kingdom Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 and the ethical policies of Eli Lilly & Co. Ltd. Rats used for locomotor activity (LMA) studies were 180–250 g in weight upon

Effects on locomotor activity

LSN2463359 induced a small but significant decrease in locomotor activity soon after drug administration and prior to injection of PCP (Fig. 1A), which was significant for the first 10 min for the 30 mg/kg dose and the first 5 min for the 10 mg/kg dose (Treatment × Time: F20,175 = 2.95, p < 0.001). This effect was not apparent in the SDZ 220,581 study, however (Fig. 1D). In Study 1, PCP induced significant hyperactivity from 10 to 120 min after injection inclusive (Main Effect of Treatment: F

Discussion

The present data demonstrate that the mGlu5 PAM LSN2463359 clearly attenuates some aspects of the behavioural response to the competitive NMDA receptor antagonist SDZ 220,581 and to the GluN2B selective NMDA receptor antagonist Ro 63-1908. Surprisingly, no such effects were seen when the open channel blockers PCP and MK-801 were used to induce similar behavioural disruption. LSN2463359 did not strongly attenuate any form of NMDA receptor antagonist-induced locomotor hyperactivity, whether

Disclosure

FG, GG, and MDT are employees of Eli Lilly and Co. Ltd. TWR discloses his consultancy with Cambridge Cognition, Lilly, Lundbeck and GlaxoSmithKline, plus research grants with Lilly, Lundbeck and GSK.

Acknowledgements

TWR acknowledges MRC and Wellcome Trust for their co-funding of the BCNI. Chris Baxter, Julie Foss, Kirstie Lloyd, Sally Loomis and Yvonne Thomas are thanked for their technical assistance.

References (53)

  • V.C. Leeson et al.

    Discrimination learning, reversal, and set-shifting in first-episode schizophrenia: stability over six years and specific associations with medication type and disorganization syndrome

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2009)
  • A.K. Malhotra et al.

    NMDA receptor function and human cognition: the effects of ketamine in healthy volunteers

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (1996)
  • J.W. Newcomer et al.

    Ketamine-induced NMDA receptor hypofunction as a model of memory impairment and psychosis

    Neuropsychopharmacology

    (1999)
  • J.W. Olney et al.

    NMDA receptor hypofunction model of schizophrenia

    J. Psychiatr. Res.

    (1999)
  • A. Pisani et al.

    Metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 mediates the potentiation of N-methyl-D-aspartate responses in medium spiny striatal neurons

    Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • H. Rosenbrock et al.

    Functional interaction of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 and NMDA-receptor by a metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 positive allosteric modulator

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2010)
  • C. Schlumberger et al.

    Comparison of the mGlu(5) receptor positive allosteric modulator ADX47273 and the mGlu(2/3) receptor agonist LY354740 in tests for antipsychotic-like activity

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2009)
  • C. Schlumberger et al.

    Effects of a positive allosteric modulator of mGluR5 ADX47273 on conditioned avoidance response and PCP-induced hyperlocomotion in the rat as models for schizophrenia

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2010)
  • M.R. Stefani et al.

    Activation of type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptors attenuates deficits in cognitive flexibility induced by NMDA receptor blockade

    Eur. J. Pharmacol.

    (2010)
  • P.N. Vinson et al.

    Metabotropic glutamate receptors as therapeutic targets for schizophrenia

    Neuropharmacology

    (2012)
  • C.R. Yang et al.

    Allosteric modulation of NMDA receptor via elevation of brain glycine and D-serine: the therapeutic potentials for schizophrenia

    Pharmacol. Ther.

    (2008)
  • N.A. Anis et al.

    The dissociative anaesthetics, ketamine and phencyclidine, selectively reduce excitation of central mammalian neurones by N-methyl-aspartate

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (1983)
  • S. Attucci et al.

    Activation of type 5 metabotropic glutamate receptors enhances NMDA responses in mice cortical wedges

    Br. J. Pharmacol.

    (2001)
  • H. Awad et al.

    Activation of metabotropic glutamate receptor 5 has direct excitatory effects and potentiates NMDA receptor currents in neurons of the subthalamic nucleus

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • J.M. Birrell et al.

    Medial frontal cortex mediates perceptual attentional set shifting in the rat

    J. Neurosci.

    (2000)
  • Y. Chudasama et al.

    Dissociable contributions of the orbitofrontal and infralimbic cortex to pavlovian autoshaping and discrimination reversal learning: further evidence for the functional heterogeneity of the rodent frontal cortex

    J. Neurosci.

    (2003)
  • Cited by (31)

    • Touchscreen learning deficits and normal social approach behavior in the Shank3B model of Phelan–McDermid Syndrome and autism

      2017, Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      We plan to delineate the main patterns of choice learning and relearning, and implement rigorous analytic measurements in our future studies. In addition, analyses of covariance could be performed, to account for variances in reversal explained by discrimination performance (Gastambide et al., 2013; Bissonette et al., 2015). These findings are consistent with the role of Shank3 in synaptic functions.

    • Biased mGlu<inf>5</inf>-Positive Allosteric Modulators Provide InVivo Efficacy without Potentiating mGlu<inf>5</inf> Modulation of NMDAR Currents

      2015, Neuron
      Citation Excerpt :

      NMDAR and mGlu5 are co-localized at postsynaptic sites implicated in the pathology of schizophrenia and their intracellular domains are physically connected via scaffold proteins (Gao et al., 2013; Hu et al., 2012; Matosin and Newell, 2013; Park et al., 2013; Shepherd and Huganir, 2007), facilitating the potentiation of NMDAR activity by mGlu5 activation (Ayala et al., 2009; Homayoun et al., 2004; Mannaioni et al., 2001; Marino and Conn, 2002). Numerous reports demonstrate that selective mGlu5 PAMs have efficacy in animal models of psychosis and cognition (Darrah et al., 2008; Gastambide et al., 2013; Gregory et al., 2013a; Kinney et al., 2003; Liu et al., 2008; Noetzel et al., 2012; Rodriguez et al., 2010), and these effects have been hypothesized to result from direct potentiation of NMDAR currents. In support of this hypothesis, previous studies revealed that mGlu5 PAMs potentiate mGlu5 modulation of NMDAR currents in pyramidal cells of the hippocampus (O’Brien et al., 2004), and we now confirm these previous findings using multiple, structurally unrelated mGlu5 PAMs.

    • Re-evaluating the PCP challenge as a pre-clinical model of impaired cognitive flexibility in schizophrenia

      2014, European Neuropsychopharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      However the automated nature of this procedure, the extreme consistency in testing, and our ability to detect selective effects of acute PCP support the lack of effect with schPCP on reversal learning and acquisition as a valid finding. It has been argued that acute aPCP induces impairments selective to reversal learning and extra dimensional set-shifting when tested in an attentional set-shifting paradigm (Gastambide et al., 2013a,b). It is not clear why different effects of aPCP are seen between acquisition and reversal learning in the bowl digging / attentional set-shifting paradigm versus a touch-screen environment, although sensory modality could influence the results (primarily vision in DVD versus multiple modalities in set-shifting).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text