Elsevier

Sleep Medicine Reviews

Volume 16, Issue 5, October 2012, Pages 397-414
Sleep Medicine Reviews

Clinical review
Sleep disturbance interventions in oncology patients and family caregivers: A comprehensive review and meta-analysis

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smrv.2011.07.002Get rights and content

Summary

Sleep disturbance is a significant problem for both oncology patients and family caregivers (FCs), and is associated with poorer functional status, quality of life, and potentially disease progression. This review describes a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of the efficacy of interventions for sleep disturbance in oncology patients and their FCs. This search revealed 47 studies that evaluated the effects of a number of interventions on sleep disturbance/sleep quality, as a primary or secondary outcome in oncology patients. The primary purposes of the review were to synthesize findings from intervention studies for sleep disturbance in oncology patients and their FCs; to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions; to identify gaps in the literature; and to provide directions for future research. In addition, all 47 intervention studies were evaluated in terms of key intervention and study characteristics. Both strong patterns and inconsistencies were identified among the studies, which complicate an evaluation of the efficacy of interventions, and may collectively guide future research. Finally, the importance of including the FC in sleep disturbance interventions is discussed. In light of the detrimental effects that sleep disturbance has on both the patient and the FC, this systematic review may better inform essential future intervention efforts.

Introduction

Recent evidence suggests that sleep disturbance is a significant problem associated with cancer and its treatment. Indeed, approximately 30–50% of oncology patients experience disrupted sleep in one form or another, a prevalence rate that exceeds that of the general population (12–25%).1 In the context of cancer, higher levels of sleep disturbance are associated with other deleterious symptoms (including fatigue, pain, and depression),2, 3 and have a negative impact on a number of patient-reported outcomes, including daily functioning and quality of life (QOL).4, 5 Notably, circadian rhythm dysregulation, potentially caused by disrupted sleep, has been linked to increased cancer incidence, as well as to disease progression and poorer prognosis, potentially mediated by dysregulation of the neuroendocrine system.6

Interestingly, the prevalence of sleep disturbance in family caregivers (FCs) of oncology patients is remarkably similar to the patients.*7, *8 This finding is not surprising considering the significant amount of stress placed on the FC, who may be overwhelmed by both escalating responsibility and the threat of losing a loved one. Moreover, sleep disturbance in FCs has similar negative effects on their functional status and QOL.9

Clearly, the magnitude and impact of sleep disturbance in oncology patients and their FCs provide evidence that this symptom warrants effective interventions in order to reduce symptom burden, improve QOL, and facilitate cancer survival. However, only a limited number of studies have evaluated the efficacy of interventions to manage sleep disturbance designed for both the patient and the FC.

The primary purposes of this review are to synthesize the findings from intervention studies for sleep disturbance in oncology patients and their FCs; to evaluate the efficacy of these interventions; to identify gaps in the literature; and to provide directions for future research.

Section snippets

Literature search strategy

A thorough review of the literature was performed using PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL®), and PsycINFO® databases from the earliest date available to 2010, as well as an evaluation of reference lists from 3 published reviews.*10, *11, *12 Search terms included “sleep”, “sleep disturbance”, “insomnia”, “intervention”, “cancer”, “oncology”, and “caregivers” in all applicable combinations. All intervention studies that evaluated sleep disturbance/sleep

Results and synthesis

As shown in Fig. 1, the vast majority (96%) of sleep disturbance intervention studies were conducted after the year 2000. This graph clearly demonstrates that the field of sleep disturbance intervention research is still in its infancy.

CBT interventions

CBT for insomnia is typically conducted in groups or one-on-one. It is commonly comprised of three components: cognitive components such as cognitive restructuring or reframing of negative or maladaptive thoughts and expectations about sleep; behavioral components including stimulus control (to re-associate the bed/bedroom with sleep); sleep restriction (to limit time in bed to sleep time), and relaxation (to reduce arousal), and an educational component referred to as sleep hygiene, that

Mode of delivery

The mode of delivery of the interventions varied widely, from purely written instructions by mail to intensive face-to-face sessions with an oncology nurse or licensed psychologist. Eight of the 47 (17%) studies did not specify the mode of delivery. Professionals included licensed psychologists, nurses, exercise physiologists, massage therapists, and other “therapists.” Interestingly, the highest proportion of studies with positive findings occurred among interventions delivered by members of

Dose and duration

The total maximum dose and duration of the reviewed interventions that explicitly reported these parameters (N = 37) are displayed in Fig. 3. An evaluation of the interventions revealed highly variable doses that ranged from 12 min to 70 h. Strikingly, a substantial proportion of studies (16 of 37; 43%) evaluated interventions that were of 5 h or less (see Fig. 3A). Because sleep disturbance is such a complex, troubling, and generally chronic symptom, it seems unreasonable to expect an

Sample size

Sample sizes for the reviewed intervention studies varied widely, with a range of 9–276 participants. Fig. 4 displays the frequency distribution for increasing sample size ranges. Notably, nearly half of the studies evaluated fewer than 50 participants, thus limiting the generalizability of the study findings. Moreover, only a small proportion (∼20%) of studies evaluated more than 100 participants. This sample size translates to roughly 50 participants per arm of an equally balanced two-arm

Type and comprehensiveness of sleep measures

The choice of measures used to assess sleep disturbance and sleep quality was highly variable across the 47 reviewed studies. However, three measures emerged as the ones used most frequently. The combination of these may be considered the gold standard for the assessment of sleep disturbance in oncology patients (Fig. 7A). Of note, the combination of these measures, the PSQI, the structured sleep diary, and wrist actigraphy, were typically employed by intervention studies that evaluated sleep

Study design and control groups

Roughly one-third (15 of 47) of the reviewed studies used a one-group pre-post or repeated measures design, as shown in Fig. 8A. Many of these were pilot, feasibility studies. Six studies (13%) used non-randomized or quasi-experimental designs with two or more groups. More than half (26 of 47; 55%) were RCTs. Six of these RCTs were 3-armed, the majority of which assessed two experimental groups, in addition to a control group. Due to small sample size in one pilot RCT that used a delayed

Interventions that target the family caregiver (FC)

Interestingly, and perhaps not surprisingly, moderate to severe sleep disturbance commonly occurs in oncology patients’ FCs.*7, *9 This symptom has similar impacts on functional status and QOL for this population,83 yet remains a virtually unexplored avenue of research. Indeed, in comparison with the 47 intervention studies targeting oncology patients, only 2 intervention studies, to our knowledge, were conducted with sleep as an outcome measure for the FCs.83, 84

Carter’s intervention,83 the

Conclusions and directions for future research

Although it is clear that consideration has been given to sleep disturbance in oncology patients, there is a dearth of research specifically devoted to improving sleep quality in both patients and their FCs. Only limited evidence is available on the efficacy of one intervention type over another, although this meta-analysis showed overall moderately clinically significant improvements in sleep disturbance in oncology patients. However, findings from the studies reviewed herein are complicated

Acknowledgments

D.J.L. is supported by a Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR) Fellowship. C.M. is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the American Cancer Society. A special thanks to Dr. Steven Paul for helpful statistical discussion. No conflicts of interest to declare.

References (85)

  • S.L. Shapiro et al.

    The efficacy of mindfulness-based stress reduction in the treatment of sleep disturbance in women with breast cancer: an exploratory study

    J Psychosom Res

    (2003)
  • O.G. Palesh et al.

    A longitudinal study of depression, pain, and stress as predictors of sleep disturbance among women with metastatic breast cancer

    Biol Psychol

    (2007)
  • C. Weze et al.

    Evaluation of healing by gentle touch in 35 clients with cancer

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2004)
  • M. van den Berg et al.

    Evaluation of haptotherapy for patients with cancer treated with chemotherapy at a day clinic

    Patient Educ Couns

    (2006)
  • S.A. Williams et al.

    The role of education in managing fatigue, anxiety, and sleep disorders in women undergoing chemotherapy for breast cancer

    Appl Nurs Res

    (2005)
  • F.I. Fawzy

    Psychosocial interventions for patients with cancer: what works and what doesn’t

    Eur J Cancer

    (1999)
  • D.J. Langford et al.

    Trajectories of pain and analgesics in oncology outpatients with metastatic bone pain during participation in a psychoeducational intervention study to improve pain management

    J Pain

    (2011)
  • J.R. Davidson et al.

    Sleep disturbance in cancer patients

    Soc Sci Med

    (2002)
  • C.H. Bastien et al.

    Validation of the Insomnia Severity Index as an outcome measure for insomnia research

    Sleep Med

    (2001)
  • P. Mackereth et al.

    Chair massage for carers in an acute cancer hospital

    Eur J Oncol Nurs

    (2005)
  • J. Savard et al.

    Insomnia in the context of cancer: a review of a neglected problem

    J Clin Oncol

    (2001)
  • J.E. Bower et al.

    Fatigue in breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates, and impact on quality of life

    J Clin Oncol

    (2000)
  • S. Carney et al.

    Differences in sleep disturbance parameters between oncology outpatients and their family caregivers

    J Clin Oncol

    (2011)
  • P.A. Carter

    Family caregivers’ sleep loss and depression over time

    Cancer Nurs

    (2003)
  • A.M. Berger et al.

    Sleep wake disturbances in people with cancer and their caregivers: state of the science

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2005)
  • M.S. Page et al.

    Putting evidence into practice: evidence-based interventions for sleep-wake disturbances

    Clin J Oncol Nurs

    (2006)
  • A.M. Berger

    Update on the state of the science: sleep-wake disturbances in adult patients with cancer

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2009)
  • C. Arving et al.

    Individual psychosocial support for breast cancer patients: a randomized study of nurse versus psychologist interventions and standard care

    Cancer Nurs

    (2007)
  • C.M. Morin et al.

    Nonpharmacological interventions for insomnia: a meta-analysis of treatment efficacy

    Am J Psychiatry

    (1994)
  • M.R. Irwin et al.

    Comparative meta-analysis of behavioral interventions for insomnia and their efficacy in middle-aged adults and in older adults 55+ years of age

    Health Psychol

    (2006)
  • D.R. Murtagh et al.

    Identifying effective psychological treatments for insomnia: a meta-analysis

    J Consult Clin Psychol

    (1995)
  • SEER Cancer Statistics review 1975–2007 [database on the internet]

    (2007)
  • A.M. Berger et al.

    Behavioral therapy intervention trial to improve sleep quality and cancer-related fatigue

    Psychooncology

    (2009)
  • L. Cohen et al.

    Psychological adjustment and sleep quality in a randomized trial of the effects of a Tibetan yoga intervention in patients with lymphoma

    Cancer

    (2004)
  • D.R. Epstein et al.

    Randomized trial of a cognitive-behavioral intervention for insomnia in breast cancer survivors

    Oncol Nurs Forum

    (2007)
  • J. Savard et al.

    Randomized clinical trial on cognitive therapy for depression in women with metastatic breast cancer: psychological and immunological effects

    Palliat Support Care

    (2006)
  • Y. Kim et al.

    The effects of information and negative affect on severity of side effects from radiation therapy for prostate cancer

    Support Care Cancer

    (2002)
  • M.F. Tang et al.

    Improving sleep quality for cancer patients: benefits of a home-based exercise intervention

    Support Care Cancer

    (2009)
  • Y.J. Wang et al.

    Effects of a 6-week walking program on Taiwanese women newly diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer

    Cancer Nurs

    (2011)
  • J.S. de Moor et al.

    Expressive writing as a presurgical stress management intervention for breast cancer patients

    J Soc Integr Oncol

    (2008)
  • G. Elkins et al.

    Randomized trial of a hypnosis intervention for treatment of hot flashes among breast cancer survivors

    J Clin Oncol

    (2008)
  • C.A. Low et al.

    A randomized controlled trial of emotionally expressive writing for women with metastatic breast cancer

    Health Psychol

    (2010)
  • Cited by (0)

    c

    Tel.: +1 415 476 9407; fax: +1 415 476 8899.

    d

    Tel.: +1 415 476 4442; fax: +1 415 753 2161.

    The most important references are denoted by an asterisk.

    View full text