Trends in Cell Biology
Ral GTPases: corrupting the exocyst in cancer cells
Section snippets
Initiation and maintenance of tumorigenic transformation
Exploration of Ras function in the budding and fission yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe generated the first insights that these proteins represent hubs in signal-transduction networks, coupling regulatory cues to the functional activation of multiple downstream effector pathways required to drive an appropriate physiological response [10]. This concept has translated to mammalian cells, where it appears that at least three major effector pathways mediate Ras
Regulation of the exocyst
Control of specialized secretory events through the Sec6/8 complex, or exocyst, has been defined as a fundamental aspect of Ral GTPase-dependent cell regulation 23, 24, 25. The exocyst is a multisubunit complex that is conserved among eukaryotes and comprises of the core elements Sec3, Sec5, Sec6, Sec8, Sec10, Sec15, Exo70 and Exo84. Characterization of exocyst assembly and function in yeasts suggests that the exocyst is a dynamic complex assembled from subunits that form a targeting patch on
Exocytosis and cancer
Ostensibly, propagation of growth-regulatory signals and control of the exocyst appear to be rather disparate occupations for Ral GTPases. However, compelling observations from studies of the behavior of normal and cancerous human epithelial cells in organotypic culture models suggest that prominent linkages between these processes support both cell proliferation and survival 39, 40. As described above, the exocyst is required to maintain the molecular polarity of epithelial cell membranes
Concluding remarks
The recent elucidation and manipulation of the Ral GTPase regulatory network in cultured cells has indicted that these proteins act as key offenders in the corruption of the core cell-autonomous machinery driving oncogenic transformation. RalA and RalB are, respectively, required to support anchorage-independent proliferation and suppress apoptosis in human cancer cells. Chronic Ral activation is sufficient in some contexts to induce oncogenic transformation and is a chief mediator of the
Acknowledgements
M.A.W. is supported by the National Institutes of Health (CA71443) and the Robert E. Welch Foundation (I-1414).
References (46)
The ras superfamily proteins
Biochimie
(1988)- et al.
Increasing complexity of the Ras signaling pathway
J. Biol. Chem.
(1998) - et al.
The Ras branch of small GTPases: Ras family members don't fall far from the tree
Curr. Opin. Cell Biol.
(2000) Endogenous oncogenic K-ras(G12D) stimulates proliferation and widespread neoplastic and developmental defects
Cancer Cell
(2004)- et al.
Ras caught in another affair: the exchange factors for Ral
Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev.
(1999) Ral-GTPases: approaching their 15 minutes of fame
Trends Cell Biol.
(2003)- et al.
Ras family therapy: Rab, Rho and Ral talk to the exocyst
Trends Cell Biol.
(2002) Understanding Ras: it ain't over ‘til it's over’
Trends Cell Biol.
(2000)- et al.
Oncogenic Ras and its role in tumor cell invasion and metastasis
Semin. Cancer Biol.
(2004) Species- and cell type-specific requirements for cellular transformation
Cancer Cell
(2004)