Original Articles
A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of single-dose intravenous secretin as treatment for children with autism,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1067/mpd.2001.112474Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether a single injection of intravenous secretin results in measurable improvements in socialization and/or communication skills in children with autism. Study design: Sixty subjects with autism were randomly selected and assigned to either treatment or placebo group. Subjects in the treatment group received 2.0 clinical units of secretin per kilogram of body weight as a single intravenous dose. Subjects in the placebo group received normal saline solution. Neurodevelopmental and behavioral assessments were performed for all subjects before injection and at 3 and 6 weeks after injection. Results: Assessment of language skills and parents’ behavioral assessments revealed no significant differences between the treatment and placebo groups. Raters’ assessments of severity of autistic symptoms did not differ for the 2 groups at 6 weeks after injection. A marginally statistically significant improvement in autistic behaviors was seen in the treatment group at 3 weeks after injection (P =.051). Conclusions: A single dose of intravenous secretin does not appear to have significant effects on either parents’ perception of autistic behaviors or language skills at 6 weeks after injection. Transient, marginally significant improvements in autistic behaviors may occur in some children. (J Pediatr 2001;138:649-55)

Section snippets

Selection of Subjects

Subjects were recruited from 2 populations of children with autism: those followed up by clinicians at the Marcus Institute for Development and Learning and those followed up by the Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite neurologists. Potential subjects (n = 203 children aged 3 to 10 years with a diagnosis of autism) were identified. A total of 63 children were randomly selected to participate in the study. Three children failed to meet pre-testing criteria for participation in the

Results

Demographic and clinical characteristics for the secretin and placebo groups at baseline are displayed in Table I.

. Demographic and clinical characteristics of secretin and placebo groups

VariableSecretin group (n = 30)Placebo group (n = 30)
Age (mo)84.6 (25.2)83.5 (28.9)
Height (in)45.8 (7.2)46.5 (7.5)
Weight (kg)27.8 (12.3)26.6 (11.2)
Sex (%)
 Male7377
 Female2327
Race (%)
 White8077
 African American1713
 Other310
Age at symptom onset (mo)18.2 (8.5)20.1 (8.5)
Age at first diagnosis (mo)33.1 (10.2)33.7 (10.1)

Discussion

We report the results of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of intravenous secretin as a treatment for autism. No significant differences in autistic behavioral characteristics or overall communication skills were noted between the treatment and the control groups at 3 or 6 weeks after injection. Parents in both groups reported similar, statistically significant improvements in their children’s behaviors at 3 and 6 weeks. Given that the same degree of perceived improvement

Acknowledgements

We thank the parents and study participants and Ms Deborah Cressler-Leithe, RN, Dr Jean MacDonald, and Ms Susan Bryant of Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta for their tireless support and contributions to the study.

References (10)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (54)

  • Pharmacotherapy

    2008, Clinical Assessment and Intervention for Autism Spectrum Disorders
  • Predicted role of secretin and oxytocin in the treatment of behavioral and developmental disorders: implications for autism

    2005, International Review of Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    The search for even partially ameliorative interventions is a goal for all parents of autistic children. Current pharmacologic treatments, such as anti‐psychotics, mood stabilizers, antidepressants, anticonvulsants, and single peptides treat single symptoms, often with unacceptable side effects and/or limited therapeutic effects (Ansorge et al., 2004; Coniglio et al., 2001; Dunn‐Geier et al., 2000; Kern et al., 2002; Lightdale et al., 2001; Owley et al., 2001; Posey and McDougle, 2000; Roberts et al., 2001; Sandler, 1999). Psychotherapeutic measures have also been attempted with limited success (Diggle et al., 2003; Langworthy‐Lam et al., 2002).

  • Effects of secretin on extracellular GABA and other amino acid concentrations in the rat hippocampus

    2005, International Review of Neurobiology
    Citation Excerpt :

    A specific effect that is described in several of the studies concerns the fact that within the secretin and the control groups a certain number of children showed improvements in their autistic behavior, which however did not differ by statistical significance. A possible explanation for this phenomenon could possibly be an effect of habituation of the children to the test situation; as well as a strong expectation effect (Coniglio, 2001; Corbett et al., 2001; Dunn‐Geier et al., 2000; Sandler et al., 1999; Unis et al., 2002). Lightdale et al. (2001) tried to replicate Horvath's results, and treated 20 autistic children with gastrointestinal problems with porcine secretin in an uncontrolled, prospective study.

  • Increased Amygdala fMRI Activation After Secretin Administration

    2008, Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology
View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta Foundation.

☆☆

Reprint requests: Susan Coniglio, MD, The Marcus Institute at Emory University, 1605 Chantilly Dr, Ste 100, Atlanta, GA 30324.

View full text