Abstract
People vary widely in their sensitivities to bitter compounds, but the intercorrelation of these sensitivities is unknown. Our goal was to investigate correlations as a function of individual sensitivities to several bitter compounds representative of different chemical classes and, from these correlations, infer the number and variety of potential bitterness transduction systems for these compounds. Twenty-six subjects rated and ranked quinine HCl, caffeine, (−)-epicatechin, tetralone, L-phenylalanine, L-tryptophan, magnesium sulfate, urea, sucrose octaacetate (SOA), denatonium benzoate, andn-propylthiouracil (PROP) for bitterness. By examining individual differences, ratings and rankings could be grouped into two general clusters—urea/phenylalanine/tryptophan/epicatechin, and quinine/caffeine/SOA/denatonium benzoate/tetralone/magnesium sulfate—none of which contained PROP. When subjects were grouped into the extremes of sensitivity to PROP, a significant difference was found in the bitterness ratings, but not in the rankings. Therefore, there are also subjects who possess diminished absolute sensitivity to bitter stimuli but do not differ from other subjects in their relative sensitivities to these compounds.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, E., Hoon, M. A., Mueller, K. L., Chandrashekar, J., Ryba, N. J. P., &Zuker, C. S. (2000). A novel family of mammalian taste receptors.Cell,100, 693–702.
Arvidson, K., &Friberg, U. (1980). Human taste: Response and taste bud number in fungiform papillae.Science,209, 807–808.
Barnicot, N. A., Harris, H., &Kalmus, H. (1951). Taste thresholds of further eighteen compounds and their correlation with P.T.C. thresholds.Annals of Eugenics,16, 119–128.
Bartoshuk, L. M. (1979). Bitter taste of saccharin related to the genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil.Science,205, 934–935.
Bartoshuk, L.M., Cunningham, K. E., Dabrila, G.M., Duffy, V.B., Etter, L., Fast, K. R., Lucchina, L.A., Prutkin, J.M., &Snyder, D. J. (1999). From sweets to hot peppers: Genetic variation in taste, oral pain, and oral touch. In G. A. Bell & A. J. Watson (Eds.),Tastes & aromas (pp. 12–22). Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., &Miller, I. J. (1994). PTC/PROP tasting: Anatomy, psychophysics, and sex effects.Physiology & Behavior,56, 1165–1171.
Bartoshuk, L. M., Duffy, V. B., Reed, D., &Williams, A. (1996). Supertasting, earaches and head injury: Genetics and pathology alter our taste worlds.Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Review,20, 79–87.
Bartoshuk, L. M., Rifkin, B., Marks, L. E., &Hooper, J. E. (1988). Bitterness of KCl and benzoate: Related to genetic status for sensitivity to PTC/PROP.Chemical Senses,13, 517–528.
Belitz, H.-D., &Wieser, H. (1985). Bitter compounds: Occurrence and structure-activity relationships.Food Reviews International,1, 271–354.
Bi, J., &O’Mahony, M. (1995). Table for testing the significance of the R-index.Journal of Sensory Studies,10, 341–347.
Boughter, J. D., Jr., &Whitney, G. (1993). Human taste thresholds for sucrose octaacetate.Chemical Senses,18, 445–448.
Boughter, J. D., Jr., &Whitney, G. (1998). Behavioral specificity of the bitter taste gene Soa.Physiology & Behavior,63, 101–108.
Brand, J. G. (1997). Biophysics of taste. In G. K. Beauchamp & L. Bartoshuk (Eds.),Tasting and smelling (2nd ed., pp. 1–24). San Diego: Academic Press.
Breslin, P.A., &Beauchamp, G. K. (1995). Suppression of bitterness by sodium: Variation among bitter taste stimuli.Chemical Senses,20, 609–623.
Caicedo, A., &Roper, S. D. (2001). Taste receptor cells that discriminate between bitter stimuli.Science,291, 1557–1560.
Capeless, C. G., Whitney, G., &Azen, E. A. (1992). Chromosome mapping of Soa, a gene influencing gustatory sensitivity to sucrose octaacetate in mice.Behavior Genetics,22, 655–663.
Chandrashekar, J., Mueller, K.L., Hoon, M.A., Adler, E., Feng, L., Guo, W., Zuker, C. S., &Ryba, N. J. P. (2000). T2Rs function as bitter taste receptors.Cell,100, 703–711.
Dahl, M., Erickson, R. P., &Simon, S.A. (1997). Neural responses to bitter compounds in rats.Brain Research,756, 22–34.
Fischer, R., &Griffin, F. (1963). Quinine dimorphism: A cardinal determinant of taste sensitivity.Nature,200, 343–347.
Frank, R. A., &Korchmar, D. L. (1985). Gustatory processing differences in PTC tasters and non-tasters: A reaction time analysis.Physiology & Behavior,35, 239–242.
Frank, R. A., Van der Klaauw, N. J., &Schifferstein, H. N. J. (1993). Both perceptual and conceptual factors influence taste—odor and taste—taste interactions.Perception & Psychophysics,54, 343–354.
Gent, J. F., &Bartoshuk, L.M. (1983). Sweetness of sucrose, neohesperidin dihydrochalcone, and saccharin is related to genetic ability to taste the bitter substance 6-n-propylthiouracil.Chemical Senses,7, 265–272.
Green, B. G., Dalton, P., Cowart, B., Shaffer, G., Rankin, K., &Higgins, J. (1996). Evaluating the “Labeled Magnitude Scale” for measuring sensations of taste and smell.Chemical Senses,21, 323–334.
Green, B. G., Shaffer, G. S., &Gilmore, M. M. (1993). Derivation and evaluation of a semantic scale of oral sensation magnitude with apparent ratio properties.Chemical Senses,18, 683–702.
Guinard, J.-X., Hong, D.Y., Zoumas-Morse, C., Budwig, C., &Russell, G. F. (1994). Chemoreception and perception of the bitterness of isohumulones.Physiology & Behavior,56, 1257–1263.
Hall, M. J., Bartoshuk, L.M., Cain, W. S., &Stevens, J. C. (1975). PTC taste blindness and the taste of caffeine.Nature,253, 442–443.
Harder, D. B., Boughter, J. D., &Whitney, G. (1996). PTCavoidance polymorphism and other bitter-avoidance differences among mice in long-term preference tests.Chemical Senses,21, 612.
Harder, D. B., Gannon, K. S., &Whitney, G. (1996). SW.B6-Soab nontaster congenic strains completed and a sucrose octaacetate congenic quartet tested with other bitters.Chemical Senses,21, 507–517.
Harder, D. B., &Whitney, G. (1998). A common polygenic basis for quinine and PROP avoidance in mice.Chemical Senses,23, 327–332.
Harder, D.B., Whitney, G., Frye, P., Smith, J. C., &Rashotte, M. E. (1984). Strain differences among mice in taste psychophysics of sucrose octa-acetate.Chemical Senses,9, 311–323.
Harris, H., &Kalmus, H. (1949). Chemical specif icity in genetical differences of taste sensitivity.Annals of Eugenics,15, 32–45.
Jefferson, S. C., &Erdman, A.M. (1970). Taste sensitivity and food aversions of teenagers.Journal of Home Economics,62, 605–608.
Kemp, S. E., &Birch, G.G. (1992). An intensity/time study of the taste of amino acids.Chemical Senses,17, 151–168.
Lawless, H. T. (1979). The taste of creatine and creatinine.Chemical Senses & Flavour,4, 249–258.
Lawless, H. T., &Clark, C. C. (1992). Psychological biases in time-intensity scaling.Food Technology,46, 1992.
Leach, E. J., &Noble, A. C. (1986). Comparison of bitterness of caffeine and quinine by a time-intensity procedure.Chemical Senses,11, 339–345.
Matsunami, H., Montmayeur, J.-P., &Buck, L. B. (2000). A family of candidate taste receptors in human and mouse.Nature,404, 601–604.
McBurney, D.H., Smith, D.V., &Shick, T. R. (1972). Gustatory cross adaptation: Sourness and bitterness.Perception & Psychophysics,11, 228–232.
Mela, D. J. (1989). Bitter taste intensity: The effect of tastant and thiourea taster status.Chemical Senses,14, 131–135.
Mela, D. J. (1990). Gustatory perception of isohumulones: Influence of sex and thiourea taster status.Chemical Senses,15, 485–490.
Miller, I. J., Jr., &Whitney, G. (1989). Sucrose octaacetate-taster mice have more vallate taste buds than non-tasters.Neuroscience Letters,100, 1–3.
O’Mahony, M. (1992). Understanding discrimination tests: A user-friendly treatment of response bias, rating and ranking R-index tests and their relationship to signal detection.Journal of Sensory Studies,7, 1–47.
O’Mahony, M., Thieme, U., &Goldstein, L. R. (1988). The warm-up effect as a means of increasing the discriminability of sensory difference tests.Journal of Food Science,53, 1848–1850.
Reed, D. R., Bartoshuk, L.M., Duffy, V., Marino, S., &Price, R.A. (1995). Propylthiouracil tasting: Determination of underlying threshold distributions using maximum likelihood.Chemical Senses,20, 529–533.
Schifferstein, H. N. J., &Frijters, J. E. R. (1991). The perception of the taste of KCl, NaCl, and quinine HCl is not related to PROP-sensitivity.Chemical Senses,16, 303–317.
Schiffman, S. S., Gatlin, L.A., Frey, A. E., Heiman, S.A., Stagner, W.C., &Cooper, D.C. (1994). Taste perception of bitter compounds in young and elderly persons: Relation to lipophilicity of bitter compounds.Neurobiology of Aging,15, 743–750.
Shingai, T., &Beidler, L. M. (1985). Interstrain differences in bitter taste responses in mice.Chemical Senses,10, 51–55.
Smith, D. V. (1971). Taste intensity as a function of areas and concentration: Differentiation between compounds.Journal of Experimental Psychology,87, 163–171.
Spielman, A. I., Huque, T., Whitney, G., &Brand, J. G. (1992). The diversity of bitter taste signal transduction mechanisms. In D. P. Corey & S. D. Roper (Eds.),Sensory transduction (pp. 308–324). New York: Rockerfeller University Press.
Thieme, U., &O’Mahony, M. (1990). Modifications to sensory difference test protocols: The warmed up paired comparison, the single standard duo—trio and the A—not A test modified for response bias.Journal of Sensory Studies,5, 159–176.
Thorngate, J. H., III (1997). Factors affecting the perception of bitterness: A review. In G. Roy (Ed.),Modifying bitterness: Mechanisms, ingredients, and applications (pp. 139–160). Valhalla, NY: Technomic Publishing.
Whitney, G., &Harder, D. B. (1994). Genetics of bitter perception in mice.Physiology & Behavior,56, 1141–1147.
Yokomukai, Y., Cowart, B. J., &Beauchamp, G. K. (1993). Individual differences in sensitivity to bitter-tasting substances.Chemical Senses,18, 669–681.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was funded by NIH Grants R29 DC02995 (to P.A.S.B) and F32 DC00384-02 (to J.F.D).
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Delwiche, J.F., Buletic, Z. & Breslin, P.A.S. Covariation in individuals’ sensitivities to bitter compounds: Evidence supporting multiple receptor/transduction mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics 63, 761–776 (2001). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194436
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03194436